Peer Review reports
From: Effective in-service training design and delivery: evidence from an integrative literature review
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll |
17 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lesley-Anne Long |
29 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugh Barr |
3 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugo Mercer |
20 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Bluestone |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugh Barr |
2 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll |
25 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lesley-Anne Long |
28 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugo Mercer |
26 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gilles Dussault |
16 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Bluestone |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Bluestone |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugo Mercer |
26 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gilles Dussault |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
2 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-51 |
You can find further information about peer review here.