Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between rural preference and graduates’ attributes: a univariable analysis

From: Attitudes toward working in rural areas of Thai medical, dental and pharmacy new graduates in 2012: a cross-sectional survey

Graduates’ attributes

Having rural preference (serving community hospitals)

Doctor (%)

Dentist (%)

Pharmacist (%)

< n= 390>

< n= 133>

< n= 121>

Sex

P value = 0.577

P value = 0.553

P value = 0.803

Male

154 (39.8)

42 (31.6)

25 (20.7)

Female

233 (60.2)

91 (68.4)

96 (79.3)

Hometown area

P value = 0.205

P value = 0.052

P value = 0.055

Urban

289 (74.9)

97 (73.5)

50 (41.3)

Rural

97 (25.1)

35 (26.5)

71 (58.7)

School location

P value = 0.250

P value = 0.151

P value = 0.957

Bangkok and vicinity

220 (59.6)

85 (63.9)

4 (3.3)

Upcountry

149 (40.4)

48 (36.1)

117 (96.7)

Mode of admission

P value = 0.044a

P value = 0.466

P value = 0.147

National entrance examination

94 (24.2)

60 (45.1)

79 (65.3)

Direct admission

165 (42.4)

55 (41.4)

25 (20.7)

CPIRD/ODOD

98 (25.2)

NA

NA

Others (for example, special quota)

32 (8.2)

18 (13.5)

17 (14.0)

Parents’ education

P value = 0.658

P value = 0.529

P value = 0.751

At least bachelor degree

279 (72.1)

90 (68.2)

72 (60.0)

Below bachelor degree

108 (27.9)

42 (31.8)

48 (40.0)

Parents’ career

P value = 0.172

P value = 0.084

P value = 0.708

Civil servant

192 (49.2)

71 (53.4)

70 (60.3)

Not civil servant

198 (50.8)

62 (46.6)

46 (39.7)

  1. aStatistical significance over 95% level of confidence.
  2. n= total number of graduates choosing ‘Community hospitals’ in the questionnaire, NA = not applicable as dentists and pharmacists did not have CPIRD/ODOD admission programme.