A systematic review of economic evaluations of CHW interventions aimed at improving child health outcomes
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 31 October 2015
Accepted: 15 February 2017
Published: 28 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henry Perry|
|7 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tom Achoki|
|27 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amani Siyam|
|5 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mwansa Annette Nkowane|
|24 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lungiswa Nkonki|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henry Perry|
|28 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tom Achoki|
|24 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mwansa Annette Nkowane|
|4 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amani Siyam|
|16 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Lungiswa Nkonki|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12960-017-0192-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.