What will make a difference? Assessing the impact of policy and non-policy scenarios on estimations of the future GP workforce
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 14 July 2016
Accepted: 15 June 2017
Published: 28 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michel Landry|
|1 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lud Van Der Velden|
|29 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mario Lopes|
|24 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline O Laurence|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michel Landry|
|4 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lud Van Der Velden|
|27 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline O Laurence|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lud Van Der Velden|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12960-017-0216-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.