Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation indicators for the Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP), National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 2001-2007

From: Seven years of the field epidemiology training programme (FETP) at Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India: an internal evaluation

 

Programme components

 

Students

Curriculum

Faculty

Field work

Laboratory

Input

▪ 86 applicants, of which 79 (92%) nominated by states

▪ Course recognized by Medical Council of India (MCI)

▪ Faculty with ICMR staff status

▪ Posting within the public health service

▪ Institutional links with ICMR and other Government laboratories

  

▪ 7 FETP-compatible core competenciesa

▪ Faculty -to- student ratio ranging from 0.40 to 0.12

▪ 75% of the time spent practicing in the field

▪ Laboratory resources

     

▪ Equipment and supplies

Process

▪ All state-nominated candidates selectedb

▪ Curricular process documented and available on-line

▪ 1.3 supervision visits and 1.9 mini contact session/FETP course

▪ 76% to 100% fieldwork assignments rated at least “very useful” by graduates

▪ 66% graduates evaluating the laboratory component as insufficient

 

▪ 82% to 96% of learning activities rated “very useful” or better by graduates

   

▪ 63% graduates rating laboratory curriculum “fair” or less

Output

▪ 69 graduates out of 80 students (86%)

▪ > 50% of graduates at least “proficient” for all competenciesc

▪ >50% of graduates rating supervisions as “good” or better

▪ 47 oral presentations

▪ 76/106 (72%) investigations with laboratory-confirmation

    

▪ 110 posters

 
    

▪ 29 publications

 
  1. aRevised in 2004.
  2. bSelection process based on written examination and on personal interview implemented since 2009 in view of the large number of applicants (50% of applicants selected).
  3. cSelf assessment during the on-line survey. However, all students had to demonstrate acquisition of the competency in order to graduate.