Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Developing a tool to measure satisfaction among health professionals in sub-Saharan Africa

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Buchan
30 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elina Dale
5 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sakari Bertel Alfred Suominen
5 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Pierre Fournier
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elina Dale
21 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sakari Bertel Alfred Suominen
5 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Pierre Fournier
Resubmission - Version 3
5 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Buchan
21 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sakari Bertel Alfred Suominen
24 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elina Dale
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
30 May 2013 Editorially accepted
4 Jul 2013 Article published 10.1186/1478-4491-11-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement