The impact of HIV/SRH service integration on workload: analysis from the Integra Initiative in two African settings

Table 3 Workload and staffing, by human resource (HR) integration category ‘more/less integrated’

	‘Less integrated’ facilities (n = 58)			‘More integrated’ facilities (n = 22)
	Mean	Mean	Mean workload ratio (low/high estimates)	Mean	Mean	Mean workload ratio (low/high estimates)
	Staff FTE available	Staff FTE required	Mean workload ratio (low/high estimates)	Staff FTE available	Staff FTE required	Mean workload ratio (low/high estimates)
Ca Cervix screening	0.06	0.02	10.98 (8.58 to 15.25)	0.10	0.03	6.79 (5.30 to 9.42)
FP	0.91	0.42	2.66 (2.43 to 2.93)	0.99	0.54	2.15 (1.96 to 2.37)
HIV care and treatment	3.21	0.87	12.09 (9.58 to 16.40)	0.45	0.03	15.86 (12.57 to 21.52)
PITC	0.33	0.09	4.65 (3.67 to 6.34)	0.22	0.14	2.19^a (1.73 to 2.98)
PNC	0.37	0.13	2.48 (2.22 to 2.80)	0.17	0.13	2.03 (1.82 to 2.29)
STI	0.05	0.03	2.68 (2.19 to 3.45)	0.09	0.06	1.63^b (1.33 to 2.09)
VCT	1.10	0.20	10.08 (7.96 to 13.76)	1.66	0.31	8.32 (6.57 to 11.35)
Other MCH/OPD service	5.44	1.09	8.39 (7.19 to 10.06)	6.19	1.70	14.69 (12.59 to 17.61)
Total facility	10.94	2.62	5.61 (4.62 to 7.15)	9.34	2.87	6.72 (5.63 to 8.35)

^adifference from ‘less integrated’ group significant at the P < 0.10 level (t = 1.79, P = 0.078).
^bdifference from ‘less integrated group significant at the P < 0.05 level (t = 2.05, P = 0.047).
FP, family planning; FTE, full time equivalency; MCH/OPD, maternal and child health/outpatient department; PITC, provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling; PNC, postnatal care; STI, sexually transmitted illness; VCT, voluntary HIV counselling and testing.

ISSN: 1478-4491