A comparative study of an NGO-sponsored CHW programme versus a ministry of health sponsored CHW programme in rural Kenya: a process evaluation
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Oct 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - MIRIAM WERE K.|
|30 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Swartz|
|7 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Drobac|
|8 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kate Ramsey|
|13 Jun 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Jackline Aridi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jun 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jul 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Swartz|
|22 Jul 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Drobac|
|28 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kate Ramsey|
|30 Sep 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Jackline Aridi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Sep 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Oct 2014||Editorially accepted|
|5 Nov 2014||Article published||10.1186/1478-4491-12-64|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.