Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparative study of an NGO-sponsored CHW programme versus a ministry of health sponsored CHW programme in rural Kenya: a process evaluation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - MIRIAM WERE K.
30 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison Swartz
7 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Drobac
8 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kate Ramsey
13 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jackline Aridi
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison Swartz
22 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Drobac
28 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kate Ramsey
30 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jackline Aridi
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Oct 2014 Editorially accepted
5 Nov 2014 Article published 10.1186/1478-4491-12-64

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement