|
Item
|
Intervention group
|
Comparison group
|
Adjusted model – interaction P valueb
|
|---|
|
Baseline, n = 27
|
Endline, n = 29
|
P valuea
|
Baseline, n = 16
|
Endline, n = 29
|
P valuea
|
|---|
|
Percentage (%) who received in-service training in past year on:
|
|
Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV
|
40.7 (11)
|
79.3 (23)
|
0.003
|
62.5 (10)
|
25.8 (8)
|
0.022
|
0.002
|
|
Antiretroviral therapy
|
55.6 (15)
|
75.9 (22)
|
0.109
|
62.5 (10)
|
44.8 (13)
|
0.266
|
0.218
|
|
Sexually transmitted infections
|
59.3 (16)
|
58.6 (17)
|
0.961
|
56.3 (9)
|
37.9 (11)
|
0.236
|
0.455
|
|
Tuberculosis
|
33.3 (9)
|
34.5 (10)
|
0.928
|
37.5 (6)
|
25.8 (7)
|
0.355
|
0.456
|
|
Infection prevention
|
37.0 (10)
|
55.2 (16)
|
0.174
|
50.0 (8)
|
58.6 (17)
|
0.588
|
0.365
|
|
Percentage (%) who received 2+ supervision visits in the past 6 months
|
52.2 (12)
|
79.3 (23)
|
0.038
|
69.2 (13)
|
73.1 (26)
|
0.808
|
0.055
|
-
a
P value from χ2 at baseline or at endline.
-
bInteraction term P value from multivariate linear regression models of each result on the intervention status, time point, and interaction of these two variables, while controlling for provider cadre and ZDF branch, and accounting for clustering of responses within each facility.
