From: The effects of performance appraisal in the Norwegian municipal health services: a case study
Variable N = | All respondent 371 | Nurse 171 | Auxiliary Nurse 163 | Subordinate 310 | Superior 55 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 Goal setting in PA - Self-assessment | -.05 (-0.28) | -.14 (-1.23) | .07 (0.57) | -.01 (-0.09) | -.05 (-0.64) |
H2a Thorough feedback in PA - Self-assessment | .44 (2.15)** | .12 (1.53) | .10 (0.68) | .13 (1.32) | .10 (1.64) |
H2b Satisfied with feedback in PA - Self-assessment | -.15 (-0.62) | .06 (0.58) | -.02 (-0.15) | -.03 (-0.36) | -.15 (-0.91) |
H3a Participate actively in PA - Self-assessment | .13 (1.11) | .12 (1.53) | .04 (0.42) | .10 (1.64)* | .13 (1.11) |
H3b Independence in PA - Self-assessment | .60 (4.87)*** | .37 (4.60)*** | .32 (3.90)*** | .25 (4.13 ) *** | .59 (4.80)*** |
H4 Education/skills before PA - Self-assessment | .15 (1.25) | .09 (1.22) | .01 (0.17) | .09 (1.45) | .32 (1.00) |
H5 PA training -Self-assessment | .22 (1.72)** | .09 (1.10) | -.05 (-0.58) | -.02 (-0.29) | .32 (1.70)** |
R2 | .18 | .24 | .19 | .15 | .46 |
The adjusted R2 | .15 | .19 | .13 | .13 | .35 |
Test of normality (Sig) | .20 | .20 | .20 | .20 | .20 |