Skip to main content

Table 3 Statistical results, standard coefficient and t-values (in parentheses) Work motivation in performance appraisal (with and without learning and self-assessment)

From: The effects of performance appraisal in the Norwegian municipal health services: a case study

Variable

N =

All respondent

371

Nurse

171

Auxiliary

Nurse

163

Subordinate

310

Superior

55

H1 Goal setting in PA - Job motivation

-.65

(-0.84)

-.16

(-1.26)

-.07

(-0.47)

-.01

(0.12)

-.28

(-1.41)

H2a Thorough feedback in PA - Job motivation

.16

(1.95)**

.04

(0.32)

.30

(2.11)**

.12

(1.34)

.26

(1.14)

H2b Satisfied with feedback in PA - Job motivation

-.01

(-0.20)

.01

(0.11)

-.09

(-0.73)

.03

(0.37)

-.16

(-0.91)

H3a Participate actively in PA - Job motivation

.04

(0.89)

.08

(1.05)

-.06

(-0.74)

.10

(1.81)*

-.25

(-2.02)

H3b Independence in PA - Job motivation

.02

(0.43)

.01

(0.18)

.02

(0.29)

.03

(0.48)

.14

(-0.86)

H4 Education/skills before PA - Job motivation

.11

(2.31)**

.08

(1.14)

.10

(1.23)

.11

(2.17)**

-.02

(-0.18)

H5 PA training - Job motivation

.03

(0.72)

-.01

(-0.20)

.02

(0.21)

.03

(0.59)

-.04

(-0.30)

Learning of PA -Job motivation

-.04

(-0.51)

.08

(0.76)

-.10

(-0.73)

-.10

(-1.20)

.13

(0.79)

Self-assessment in PA - Job motivation

.21

(4.06)***

.26

(3.56)***

.16

(1.90)**

.18

(3.35)***

.46

(2.90)***

R2

.36

.40

.29

.38

.44

The adjusted R2

.33

.36

.23

.35

.30

Test of normality (Sig)

.20

.20

.20

.20

.20

  1. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.10