Table 3 Probabilities of PC promotion predicted by the generalized estimated equation (GEE) model with continuous variables (age and year) supposedly focused
Gender | Grade of PC | Specialty | Predicted probability |
|---|---|---|---|
Men | Senior specialist | Feminized | 0.722 203 5 |
Women | Senior specialist | Feminized | 0.675 362 8 |
Men | Consultant | Feminized | 0.256 266 7 |
Women | Consultant | Feminized | 0.216 133 9 |
Men | Senior consultant | Feminized | 0.586 477 8 |
Women | Senior consultant | Feminized | 0.531 594 7 |
Men | Senior specialist | Parity | 0.635 839 5 |
Women | Senior specialist | Parity | 0.582 847 9 |
Men | Consultant | Parity | 0.503 629 7 |
Women | Consultant | Parity | 0.448 098 4 |
Men | Senior consultant | Parity | 0.513 531 5 |
Women | Senior consultant | Parity | 0.457 915 6 |
Men | Senior specialist | Masculinised | 0.638 706 9 |
Women | Senior specialist | Masculinised | 0.585 860 8 |
Men | Consultant | Masculinised | 0.505 287 4 |
Women | Consultant | Masculinised | 0.449 738 9 |
Men | Senior consultant | Masculinised | 0.570 206 8 |
Women | Senior consultant | Masculinised | 0.514 950 3 |