Skip to main content

Table 3 Safety attitude scale descriptives

From: Assessing health-care providers’ readiness for reporting quality and patient safety indicators at primary health-care centres in Lebanon: a national cross-sectional survey

SAQ scale item

N

Mean

SD

% Positivea

Skewness

Kurtosis

Patient safety is constantly reinforced as the priority in this centre

931

4.50

0.70

94.1

−1.858

5.475

Providers in this centre are encouraged to report any patient safety concerns they may have

911

4.30

0.77

89.6

−1.432

3.435

I would feel safe being treated here as a patient

931

4.25

0.80

86.6

−1.254

2.353

All the personnel in this office take responsibility for patient safety

916

4.14

0.89

84.2

−1.285

2.005

The proper channels to direct questions regarding patient safety in this office are made clear in this centre

920

4.10

0.82

84.0

−1.116

1.947

The culture in this office makes it easy to learn from errors of others

924

4.05

0.84

82.0

−1.102

1.818

Changes are necessary to encourage providers to discuss errors

916

4.10

0.84

81.7

−1.031

1.582

Medical errors are handled appropriately in this centre

915

4.08

0.88

81.3

−1.166

1.882

I receive appropriate feedback about my performance

916

4.05

0.90

80.8

−1.083

1.224

There is widespread adherence to clinical guidelines and evidence-based criteria regarding patient safety in this centre

899

4.06

0.83

80.5

−1.018

1.721

Briefing other personnel before a procedure (e.g. biopsy) is important for patient safety

881

3.92

0.92

72.4

−.814

.663

All the necessary information for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions is routinely available to providers in this centre

925

3.77

0.95

68.9

−.651

−.051

Briefings are common in this centre

871

3.62

0.94

60.0

−.623

.365

The medical equipment in this centre is adequate

927

3.23

1.18

48.1

−.193

−1.015

Disruptions in the continuity of care (e.g. shift changes, and patient transfers) can be detrimental to patient safety

896

2.96

1.26

41.1

−.051

−1.153

Providers are not punished for errors reported through incident reports

909

2.28

1.14

12.8

.700

−.140

bThere exists some barriers that compromise the safety of patients in this centre

913

2.01

1.05

11.6

.990

.305

bProviders frequently disregard rules or guidelines (e.g. hand washing, treatment protocols/clinical pathways and sterile field) that are established for this centre

924

1.91

1.05

9.4

1.103

.559

bErrors that had the potential to harm patients were made in this centre

917

1.97

1.00

8.6

.924

.291

Safety attitude climate total score

938

3.87

0.43

83.5

α = 0.80

  1. aPercent positive scores are the percentage of respondents who have positive attitudes towards each factor: score more than or equal to 75 for item scores and more than or equal to 62.5 for total score
  2. bReverse-scored item