Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics of midwifery associations, by region

From: A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway

  

Countdown countries in

 

All countries

Sub-Saharan Africa

Eastern Mediterranean

South-East Asia

Western Pacific

Americas

Europe

 

(n = 73)

(n = 41)

(n = 9)

(n = 6)

(n = 6)

(n = 6)

(n = 5)

Association

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 Professional association exists that midwives can join

72 (97)

41 (100)

9 (100)

6 (100)

6 (100)

6 (100)

4 (80)

 Midwives-only association exists

54 (74)

34 (85)

7 (78)

4 (67)

4 (67)

3 (50)

2 (40)

Associations’ roles

       

 Continuing professional development

68 (93)

39 (95)

8 (89)

6 (100)

5 (83)

5 (83)

5 (100)

 Advising members of quality standards

68 (93)

40 (98)

7 (78)

6 (100)

5 (83)

5 (83)

5 (100)

 Advising the government on the most recent National MNH or health policy document

61 (84)

36 (88)

6 (67)

6 (100)

4 (67)

6 (100)

3 (60)

 Advising or representing members accused of misconduct or incompetence

50 (67)

32 (78)

4 (44)

5 (83)

3 (50)

3 (50)

3 (60)

 Negotiating work or salary issues with the government

46 (63)

31 (76)

2 (22)

4 (67)

2 (33)

5 (83)

2 (40)

  1. Note that the data only relate to the Countdown countries within each region and are not necessarily typical of the entire region