Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The evolution of the national licensing system of health care professionals: a qualitative descriptive case study in Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Brownie
19 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eszter Kovacs
6 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Pacey
7 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Stiphout
3 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Miwa Sonoda
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Brownie
14 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Stiphout
15 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eszter Kovacs
25 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Miwa Sonoda
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Brownie
16 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eszter Kovacs
10 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Miwa Sonoda
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
7 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12960-017-0215-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement