| Coordination | Integration | Sustainability |
---|---|---|---|
Framework | |||
Health issue | Coordination between HIV and other health priorities; availability of a standardized community healthcare package | Variability in health priorities between national and sub-national levels | Easily identifiable health issues; broadness of focus and training of CHWs; reach of coverage of services |
Intervention | Existence of cadres with specialized skills (which may be more complex to manage and evaluate); existence of parallel training and support structures for CHWs | Equivalence between differently trained CHWs; CHW hiring procedures; level of workload and supervision of CHWs; existence of standardized incentives; level of professionalization | Level of workload and supervision of CHWs; local modifiability; existence of standardized incentives; community participation and involvement of local decision-makers; CHW demographics; gender bias |
Stakeholders | Number of stakeholders; awareness of need for coordination; existence of similar funding timelines, forums (such as working groups) and reports; result-oriented programming and reporting; “NGO challenge” | Perceived effectiveness of program; involvement of multiple public or private actors; position and power of health professionals; pace of CHW scale-up; dependence on external actors | Strength of leadership; level of commitment to coordination and integration; dependence on external actors; perceived effectiveness of the intervention; level of community buy-in |
Health system | Existence of a single organizational structure dedicated to community health initiatives; level of decentralization; training of health workers; coordination with health facilities | Formal recognition of CHW programs by government; parallel supply chains; standardized training, supervision and monitoring of CHWs; public or private capacity; existence of a common funding pool | Public or private resources; existence of CHW training refreshers; attrition among young CHWs; coordination and integration of CHW programs; “NGO challenge”; predictability of funding |
Broad context | Level of political support among all stakeholders and across government levels (or large private providers) for CHW-led services | Level of CHW program compatibility with local (community) structures; socioeconomic context and cultural values; political support for CHWs; community perception | Level of alignment with community norms and needs; level of political support and economic growth; level of support from external actors |