Improving the performance of community health workers in Swaziland: findings from a qualitative study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vihideh Sadeghi|
|19 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elena Jirovsky|
|5 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pascal Geldsetzer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pascal Geldsetzer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elena Jirovsky|
|23 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vihideh Sadeghi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|18 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12960-017-0236-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.