Table 2 Effect of community health worker intervention on public satisfaction
ITT | CACE | ITT with MI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δppt | 95% CI | p value | Δppt | 95% CI | p value | Δppt | 95% CI | p value | |
Satisfaction with community health worker program | |||||||||
Very satisfied | 9 | − 2, 20 | 0.10 8 | 18 | − 5, 41 | 0.12 6 | 10 | 0, 20 | 0.04 4 |
Satisfied or very satisfied | 16 | 3, 30 | 0.01 6 | 34 | 8, 60 | 0.01 1 | 18 | 6, 29 | 0.00 5 |
Neutral or above | 12 | 2, 21 | 0.02 1 | 25 | 5, 46 | 0.01 5 | 11 | 3, 19 | 0.00 8 |
Dissatisfied or above | 5 | 0, 10 | 0.06 8 | 10 | 0, 21 | 0.06 0 | 5 | 0, 9 | 0.03 8 |
Very dissatisfied | 0 | – | – | 0 | – | – | 0 | – | – |
N | 2 077 | 1 799 | 2 312 | ||||||
Satisfaction with the public healthcare system in Dar es Salaam | |||||||||
Very satisfied | 9 | 0, 17 | 0.04 8 | 19 | −1, 39 | 0.06 0 | 8 | 0, 17 | 0.05 8 |
Satisfied or very satisfied | 15 | 3, 27 | 0.01 5 | 35 | 10, 60 | 0.00 6 | 14 | 3, 26 | 0.01 8 |
Neutral or above | 3 | −5, 11 | 0.45 6 | 9 | −9, 27 | 0.34 7 | 4 | −4, 11 | 0.35 3 |
Dissatisfied or above | 1 | −3, 4 | 0.74 4 | 1 | −6, 9 | 0.75 2 | 1 | −3, 5 | 0.64 4 |
Very dissatisfied | 0 | – | – | 0 | – | – | 0 | – | – |
N | 2 171 | 1 871 | 2 312 | ||||||