Table 4 Bivariate analysis between the health service organization variables and oral health indicators according to the entry of the OHT into the public health service in the participating municipalities, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2014
Variables | 2011 | 2014 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Entered | Not entered | p* | Entered | Not entered | p* | ||||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||||
Health services organization | Population coverage of FHT | ||||||||||
< 100% | 11 | 12.4 | 78 | 87.6 | 0.685 | 10 | 14.3 | 60 | 85.7 | 0.657 | |
= 100% | 5 | 15.2 | 28 | 84.8 | 6 | 11.5 | 46 | 88.5 | |||
Population coverage of DHT | |||||||||||
< 70% | 9 | 12.3 | 64 | 87.7 | 0.754 | 7 | 11.3 | 55 | 88.7 | 0.544 | |
≥ 70% | 7 | 14.3 | 42 | 85.7 | 9 | 15.0 | 51 | 85.0 | |||
DHT/FHT ratio | |||||||||||
< 70% | 9 | 14.5 | 53 | 85.5 | 0.641 | 5 | 8.9 | 51 | 91.1 | 0.207 | |
≥ 70% | 7 | 11.7 | 53 | 88.3 | 11 | 16.7 | 55 | 83.3 | |||
Presence of DHT modality II | |||||||||||
No | 11 | 12.4 | 78 | 87.6 | 0.685 | 7 | 8.3 | 77 | 91.7 | 0.020 | |
Yes | 5 | 15.2 | 28 | 84.8 | 9 | 23.7 | 29 | 76.3 | |||
Dentists per 1 000 inhabitants | |||||||||||
< 0.67 | 12 | 14.5 | 71 | 85.5 | 0.521 | 10 | 12.3 | 71 | 87.7 | 0.724 | |
≥ 0.67 | 4 | 10.3 | 35 | 89.7 | 6 | 14.6 | 35 | 85.4 | |||
Oral health indicators | First consultation | ||||||||||
< 15% | 9 | 11.7 | 68 | 88.3 | 0.541 | 9 | 9.9 | 82 | 90.1% | 0.071 | |
≥ 15% | 7 | 15.6 | 38 | 84.4 | 7 | 22.6 | 24 | 77.4% | |||
Supervised dental brushing | |||||||||||
< 3.5 | 8 | 12.1 | 58 | 87.9 | 0.724 | 4 | 5.9 | 64 | 94.1% | 0.008 | |
≥ 3.5 | 8 | 14.3 | 48 | 85.7 | 12 | 22.2 | 42 | 77.8% | |||