Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the P4P schemes for diabetes management in single-payer national health systems

From: The evidence gap on gendered impacts of performance-based financing among family physicians for chronic disease care: a systematic review reanalysis in contexts of single-payer universal coverage

Study location

Intervention description

Year introduced

Australia

Bonuses (higher in rural areas) for enrolment and compliance with guidelines for diabetes care, asthma care, and cancer screening

2001

Canada—province of British Columbia

Annual bonus for fee-for-service physicians for compliance with guideline-informed care for two or more targeted chronic conditions

2007

Canada—province of New Brunswick

Annual bonus for fee-for-service family physicians for compliance with diabetes care guideline

2010

Denmark

Annual bonus for compliance with diabetes care guideline

2007

Italy—Emilia-Romagna region

Special payments for guideline-based diabetes care

2003

Sweden—Västra Götaland county

Bonuses for registration of patients with diabetes and achievement of clinical care targets

2011

Taiwan

Bonuses for physician enrolment following diabetes care training plus additional payments for compliance with patient care guideline and performance metrics

2001

United Kingdom

Point-based bonus system among general practices for performance metrics in areas of clinical care, practice organization, and patient experience

2004

  1. Source: Adapted from [5]