Skip to main content

Table 3 Values attached to outcome of interest; answers provided on a 9-point Likert scale

From: Increasing access to health workers in rural and remote areas: what do stakeholders’ value and find feasible and acceptable?

Outcome

Mean

% with a ‘9’ rating

Workforce performance

  

 Improved availability of health workers

7.5

45%

 Improved competence of health workers

7.3

37%

 Improved responsiveness of health workers to community needs

7.2

31%

 Improved productivity of health workers to do tasks more efficiently

6.8

22%

 Improved public/community recognition of rural/remote health workers

7.3

36%

 Improved cooperation (between rural and urban health workers)

7.0

31%

 Improved motivation

7.4

42%

 Improved personnel development and lifelong learning opportunities

7.4

36%

 Reduced turnover rate of health workers leaving remote/rural posts

7.3

39%

Health systems

  

 Improved accessibility (coverage of interventions)

7.3

36%

 Improved quality of care

7.3

33%

 Improved productivity (of the health system)

7.1

31%

 Improved social accountability

7.0

27%

 Improved responsiveness

7.0

25%

 Improved practice environment (including supportive supervision)

7.4

34%

 Improved rural recruitment of health workers

7.3

40%

 Improved rural attractiveness to health workers

7.8

52%

 Improved workforce skills mix

7.0

26%

 Improved scope of practice

6.7

20%