Table 1 Frequency distributions, total responses, and mean ratings of program evaluation survey responses
Survey category | Frequency (no.) of responses counted | Â | Â | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total responses | Mean rating | |
Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither agree nor disagree | Agree | Strongly agree | |||
CamLQMS action planning was valuable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 4.52 |
Formal training was valuable | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 27 | 4.22 |
In-person mentoring was valuable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 4.56 |
Zoom call check-ins were valuable | 3 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 27 | 3.44 |
Overall program structure was effective | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 27 | 4.11 |