Skip to main content

Table 4 Open-ended responses by CTSs regarding potential risks and benefits of task-shifting community-based MDR-TB care (n = 82)

From: Task-shifting directly observed treatment and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis injection administration to lay health workers: stakeholder perceptions in rural Eswatini

 

N (%)

Potential risks (n = 213)

 

 Compromised quality of care

60 (73.2)

 Malpractice liability fears

40 (48.8)

 Poor infection prevention and control

36 (43.9)

 Inadequate training

20 (24.9)

 Irregular supervision

18 (22.0)

 Increased non-adherence to treatment

14 (17.1)

 Poor retention of CTSs

10 (12.2)

 Power conflict with community MDR-TB nurses

9 (11.0)

 Othera

6 (7.3)

Potential strategies to mitigate the risks (n = 174)

 

 Appropriate training

69 (84.1)

 Regular supportive supervision

40 (48.8)

 Simplified instructions and job aids

31 (37.8)

 Regulation

23 (28.0)

 Improved availability of medical supplies

11 (13.4)

Potential benefits (n = 281)

 

 Increased MDR-TB treatment access

78 (95.1)

 Reduced transport-related treatment access barriers

65 (79.3)

 Improved adherence to MDR-TB treatment

63 (76.7)

 Reduced stigma

32 (39.0)

 Improved social status of CTSs

21 (25.6)

 Reduced workload for community MDR-TB nurses

15 (18.3)

 Increased pool of healthcare workers

7 (8.5)

  1. aOther includes disintegrated healthcare system, uncertainty over long-term sustainability and reduced focus on training skilled healthcare workers