Table 5 Opinions of CM and CG towards selected aspects of CG performance
CG performance | Agreed responses | |
|---|---|---|
CM, n/N (%) | CG, n/N (%) | |
Having CG increased accessibility to LTC services | 76/96 (72.4) | 237/300 (79.0) |
Having CG reduced health workforce workloads | 73/96 (69.5) | 212/292 (72.6) |
CG was accepted by the patients and their relatives | 69/96 (65.7) | 227/298 (76.2) |
CG had good attitude towards the patients | 71/95 (67.0) | 219/300 (73.0) |
CG received adequate support from CM | 69/96 (66.3) | 213/292 (72.9) |
CG recruitment was properly conducted | 60/96 (57.1) | 173/298 (58.1) |
Number of CG was adequate for workload | 55/96 (51.9) | 98/302 (32.5) |
CG received adequate training | 47/95 (44.3) | 198/300 (65.3) |
CG had sufficient skills | 46/95 (43.4) | 144/300 (48.0) |
CG was properly retained to work for LTC in the long term | 30/96 (28.6) | 196/295 (66.4) |
CG’s wage was adequate | 25/96 (27.5) | 79/285 (27.7) |