Skip to main content

Table 4 The SWOT analysis of the UK case

From: Regulating health professional scopes of practice: comparing institutional arrangements and approaches in the US, Canada, Australia and the UK

Transparent and publicly accountable risk-based processes with separate oversight body
A range of approaches for nimble scope of practice changes
Regulators operate under different legislative frameworks
Lack of a risk assessment methodology to align practice risk to relevant level of assurance
Lack of shared objectives between professional and system regulators
Focus on evidence-informed right-touch regulation
Government reform to modernize professional regulation
Lack of clear definition of scope of practice may weaken reform efforts
Complex institutional arrangements make it difficult to determine if unmanaged risks to patient safety exist