Skip to main content

Table 4 The SWOT analysis of the UK case

From: Regulating health professional scopes of practice: comparing institutional arrangements and approaches in the US, Canada, Australia and the UK

Strengths

Transparent and publicly accountable risk-based processes with separate oversight body

A range of approaches for nimble scope of practice changes

Weaknesses

Regulators operate under different legislative frameworks

Lack of a risk assessment methodology to align practice risk to relevant level of assurance

Lack of shared objectives between professional and system regulators

Opportunities

Focus on evidence-informed right-touch regulation

Government reform to modernize professional regulation

Threats

Lack of clear definition of scope of practice may weaken reform efforts

Complex institutional arrangements make it difficult to determine if unmanaged risks to patient safety exist