From: What is known about paediatric nurse burnout: a scoping review
Maslach Burnout Inventory | ||||||
Author(s) | Number of pediatric nurses | Adaption to the tool | Additional/alternative results | Personal Accomplishment subscale | Depersonalization Subscale | Emotional Exhaustion Subscale |
Adwan [25] | 120 | No | PA: min-max, 13–48, avg. 38, SD = 5.7 (moderate) | DP: 0–19, avg. 5.8, SD = 4.7 (low) | EE: 5–45, avg. 21, SD = 8.58 (moderate) | |
Akman et al. [26] | 165 | No | PA: high | DP: low | EE: low | |
Alves and Guirardello [27] | 267 | Yes | EE only | EE: min-max, 9–39, avg. = 21.5, SD = 6 (moderate) | ||
Aytekin et al. [29] | 85 | No | PA: min-max, 1–22, avg. = 11.43, SD = 4.63 | DP: min-max, 0–13, avg. = 3.87, SD = 2.77 | EE: min-max, 3–27, avg. = 14.9, SD = 5.53 | |
Bourbonnais et al. [34] | 57 | Yes | Separated out EE only | High EE: 20 (35%) Crude Prevalence Ratio: 1.04 | ||
Czaja et al. [37] | 173 | No | 46% low PA | 38% had high DP | 45% had EE | |
Davis et al. [38] | 15 | No | PA: 6.67% low, 53.3% mod, 40% high | |||
Dos Santos Alves et al. [39] | 267 | No | Moderate EE: mean 21.5 (SD ± 6); high EE: 27% | |||
Edmonds et al. [42] | 88 | No | Pre-intervention: PA: mean 35.9 (6.4), 30.7% low PA | Pre-intervention: DP: mean 6.1(4.8), 25% high | Pre-intervention: EE: mean 22.3 (9.7), 24.1% high Post-intervention: EE change: mean 2.2 (6.3) Wilcoxon signed-rank 0.007 7-month post-intervention: EE change: mean 2.3 (8.6) Wilcoxon signed-rank 0.004 | |
Favrod et al. [45] | 91 | No | PA: mean 31.6 (5.5), high = 3.6%, mod. = 35.7%, low = 60.7% | DP: mean 4.8 (4.1), low = 64.3%, mod. = 29.8%, high = 6.0% | EE: mean = 23(9.9), low = 31%, mod = 47.6%, high = 21.4% | |
Gallagher and Gormley [46] | 30 | No | PA: low = 16.7%, mod. = 33.3%, high = 50% | DP: low = 63.3%, mod. = 33.3%, high = 3.3% | EE: low = 26.7%, mod. = 46.7%, High = 26.7% | |
Gauthier et al. [47] | 45 | No | Pre/post-intervention trends: significant quadratic trajectory of PA in which PA increased at time 2 and decreased at time 3 [F(1, 35) 5.43, P = 0.03], with no significant trends for EE and DP | Baseline: high PA mean 47.29 (7.43) | Baseline: High DP, mean = 13.33 (5.84) | Baseline: High EE, mean = 31.39 (9.85) |
Günüşen et al. [48] | 117 | No | PA: 19.20 (4.18) | DP: 6.14 (2.98), | EE: 18.85 (6.21) | |
Habadi et al. [49] | 22 | No | Burnout = 0.55% | Low PA: 36.4% | High DP: 22.7% | High EE: 59% |
Hylton et al. [53] | 20 | No | EE: 39.9 (7.1) | DP: 12.5 (6.2) | EE: 33 (13.8) | |
Jacobs et al. [54] | 47 | Yes—used in conjunction with Copenhagen Burnout Inventory | Analysis of subgroup differences between nurses and non-nurses indicated a trend toward nurses reporting higher work-related burnout (39.92 vs. 35.86, P < .067) and client-related burnout (23.88 vs. 18.96, P < .061). | |||
Klein et al. [56] | 302 | Yes—selection of 10 questions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory: MBI covering each subscale | “I have accomplished many worthwhile things in this job” = 4.32 (4.13–4.50); “I feel very energetic” = 4.11 (3.93–4.28); “In my work, I deal with emotional problems very calmly” = 3.07 (2.83–3.31); “I feel fatigued when I get up in the morning and have to face another day on the job” = 1.91 (1.74–2.08); “I feel emotionally drained from my work” = 1.29 (1.16–1.41); “I feel burned out from my work” = 1.26 (1.13–1.40); “I feel frustrated by my job” = 1.26 (1.14–1.38); “I worry that this job is hardening me emotionally” = 0.89 (0.74–1.04); “I do not really care what happens to some patients” = 0.41 (0.30–0.53); “I feel I treat some patients as if they were impersonal objects” = 0.24 (0.16–0.32) | |||
Lewiston et al. [59] | 38 | No | 9 RNs had burnout greater than the mean (high burnout) and 11 had burnout below the mean (low burnout) | |||
Liakopoulou et al. [61] | 71 | No | PA mean = 37.8 (5.8) | DP mean = 5.2 (4.9) | EE mean = 27.5 (9.5) | |
Lin et al. [62] | 14 | No | PA mean = 34.5 (7.1) (moderate) | DP mean = 3.6 (4.0) (low) | EE mean = 24.2 (15.6) (moderate) | |
Liu et al. [64] | 101 | No | mean = 7.09 (3.23) (lower job burnout) | |||
Moussa and Mahmood [71] | 55 | No | PA: high level burnout 14.5%, low level burnout 85.5% | DP: high level burnout 74.5%, low level burnout 25.5% | EE: high level burnout 56.4%, low level burnout 43.6%; | |
Mudallal et al. [72] | 39 | No | PA: mean = 31.23 (12.14) | DP: mean = 12.74 (4.89) | EE: mean = 28.33 (12.63) | |
Nguyen et al. [75] | 78 | No | 16.7% burned out, 14.1% exhausted, 3.8% depressed, 65.4% healthy | PA = 4.06 (0.61) | DP mean = 2.86 (0.73) | EE mean = 3.12 (0.95) |
Oehler and Davidson [76] | 121 | No | Overall, scores represent moderate EE, DP, and high lack of PA | low PA mean = 36.6, mod PA mean = 32.8, high PA mean = 30.6 | low DP mean = 2.7, mod DP mean = 7.2, high DP mean = 11.9 | Low EE mean = 12.2, mod EE mean = 24.2, high EE mean = 32.7 |
Oehler et al. [77] | 49 | No | PA mean = 32.1 (6.9) (high) | DP mean = 6.9 (4.9) (moderate) | EE mean = 24.1 (10.1) (moderate) | |
Ohue et al. [78] | 27 | Yes—revised version of MBI | PA mean = 14.44 (4.26) | DP mean = 12.44 (4.21) | EE mean = 17.44 (3.61) | |
Paula Vega et al. [98] | 153 | No | 79.7% (n = 122) showed medium to low level of PA, and it was more evident in oncology professionals, as 41% of them showed low PA. | 16% (n = 11) had a high level of DP. | 48.4% (n = 74) of participants had a medium or high level of EE. | |
Profit et al. [80] | 1 499 | Yes—four-item Emotional Exhaustion scale, based on the MBI | Nurses reporting burnout mean = 26.9%, SD = 11.4, P = 0.0004 (based on the authors determined cutoff) | |||
Richter et al. [81] | 17 | No | Nurses in the pilot study experienced average levels of PA during the pilot phase of the study. No changes across the pre/post-intervention phases. | Nurses in the pilot study experienced low levels of DP and no changes across the pre/post-intervention phases. | Nurses in the pilot study experienced high levels of EE and no changes across the pre/post-intervention phases. | |
Rochefort and Clarke [83] | 339 | Yes—only EE subscale | 35.7% had EE scores higher than the published norms for medical personnel. | |||
Rodrigues et al. [85] | 73 | Yes—only EE and DP subscales | DP mean = 6.24 (4.67) (20% have high DP) | EE mean = 24.39 (11.68) (46% have high EE) | ||
Rodrigues et al. [84] | 33 | Yes—only EE and DP subscales | DP pre: 11.34 (4.66), DP post: 9.25 (3.23) 63% reported high DP at baseline, and 3 months after the intervention, there were still 34% reporting high DP. | EE pre: 32.38 (11.29), EE post: 29.47 (10.52) 73% of our nurses reported high EE at baseline, and 3 months after the intervention, there were still 47% of our nurses reporting high EE. | ||
Rodriguez-Rey et al. [86] | 281 | No | PA mean = 37.74 (6.88) | DP mean = 6.41 (4.56) | EE mean = 21.74 (9.17) | |
Skorobogatova et al. [89] | 94 | No | PA mean = 29.1 (10.12); low levels of self-esteem and self-efficacy and achievement (as components of professional burnout) were found in 61.7%, and moderate levels were found in 23.4% of respondents | DP mean = 3.8 (4.75); moderate levels of DP in 9.6% and high levels in 12.8% of nurses | EE mean = 14.4 (7.91); overall, moderate EE was common in 41.5% and high in 9.6% of neonatal nurses. | |
Soroush et al. [90] | 86 | No | Burnout mean = 46.2 (12.5) (mod) | PA mean = 22.6 (5.4 (strong lack of PA)) | DP mean = 2.6 (31) (weak) | EE mean = 21.28 (8.1 (mod)) |
Stimpfel et al. [92] | 3 710 | No | Nurses who work 8 h shifts: 25% burned out; nurses who work 12 h shifts: 24% burned out; nurses who work > 13 h shifts: 46% burned out | |||
Sun et al. [93] | 51 | No | 14 (27.5%) were positive for burnout, and 37 (72.5%) were negative for burnout. | |||
Sun et al. [94] | 277 | No | PA mean = 33.88 (2.77) | DP mean = 10.97 (1.67) | EE mean = 21.45 (2.92) | |
Vicentic et al. [97] | 60 | No | Nurses/techs for children with CP: PA mean = 36.40 (6.473) (30% low risk, 40% mod risk, 30% high risk) Nurses/tech for children without CP: PA mean = 36.37 (11.180) (47% low risk, 30% mod risk, 23% high risk) | Nurses/techs for children with CP: DP mean = 4.31 (5.594) (87% low risk, 13% high risk) Nurses/tech for children without CP: DP mean = 4.47 (4.584) (83% low risk, 17% high risk) | Nurses/techs for children with CP: EE mean = 25.67 (15.043) (33% low risk, 17% mod risk, 50% high risk Nurses/tech for children without CP: EE mean = 17.57 (10.153)(53% low risk, 30% mod risk, 17% high risk) | |
Watson and Feld [99] | 14 | No | PA mean = 34.93 (4.53) | DP mean = 4.86 (4.41) | EE mean = 22.27 (10.31) | |
Yao et al. [100] | 44 | No | PA mean = 11.0 (9.7) | DP mean = 7.0 (6.1) | EE mean = 32.8 (15.5) | |
Zanatta and Lucca [101] | 57 | No | PA: high 24.6%, mod 52.6%, low 22.8% | DP: high 29.8%, mod 43.9%, low 26.3% | EE: high 24.6%, mod 49.1%, low 26.3% | |
Professional Quality of Life Scale | ||||||
Author(s) | Number of pediatric nurses | Results | ||||
Amin et al. [28] | 129 | Low: 26.4% (34) | Moderate: 50.4% (65) | High: 23.3% (30) | ||
Barr [30] | 142 | mean = 2.4, SD = .52 | ||||
Berger et al. [32] | 239 | Low: 23% (55) | Moderate: 47.7% (114) | High: 29.3 (70) | ||
Branch and Klinkenberg [35] | 179 | Mean = 49.7 (9.6) | ||||
Meadors et al. [66] | 23 | Mean = 14.82 (4.33) | ||||
Roney and Acri [87] | 318 | The 25th percentile ranking for the Burnout subscale of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) measure was 43.45, the 50th percentile ranking was 49.22, and the 75th percentile was 56.92. | ||||
The average score on the burnout subscale is 50, which is higher than the 50th percentile ranking in this current study (slightly lower than average levels of burnout). | ||||||
Sekol and Kim [88] | 240 | Surgical unit burnout = 24.5 (5.1); medical unit burnout = 22.8 (4.7); critical care unit burnout = 23.0 (4.7); hematology/oncology unit burnout = 20.2 (3.9) | ||||
Compassion Fatigue Self-Test | ||||||
Author(s) | Number of pediatric nurses | Results | ||||
Kase et al. [55] | 43 | 4.7% prevalence | ||||
Latimer et al. [58] | 27 | Mean = 23(10.8) (significantly higher than pediatric allied health providers) | ||||
Li et al. [60] | 251 | Mean = 24.01 (SD = 11.67) | ||||
Meyer et al. [16] | 251 | Mean = 24.01 (SD = 11.67) | ||||
Morrison Wylde et al. [70] | 95 | Score after smartphone-delivered mindfulness: 22.37 (11.90) | ||||
Score after traditional delivered mindfulness: 26.14 (11.25) | ||||||
Robins et al. [82] | 136 | Mean = 27.8 (10.6)—extremely low risk | ||||
The Tedium Measure | ||||||
Author(s) | Number of pediatric nurses | Results | ||||
Pagel and Wittmann [79] | 74 | The burnout scale mean for all subjects was 3.5855 with a standard deviation of .701. The scores ranged from 1.7142 to 5.4766 (signifies evidence of burnout). | ||||
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory | ||||||
Author(s) | Number of pediatric nurses | Results | ||||
Faller et al. [44] | 117 | Half had high work-related burnout, and half had low work-related burnout. | ||||
Jacobs et al. [54] | 47 | Analysis of subgroup differences between nurses and non-nurses indicated a trend toward nurses reporting higher work-related burnout (39.92 vs. 35.86, P < .067) and patient-related burnout (23.88 vs. 18.96, P < .061). *Conducted with MBI | ||||
Morelius et al. [69] | 47 | NICU nurses: CBI, personal related burnout: 32.4 (13.8); work-related burnout: 24.3 (9.9); client-related burnout: 13.3 (9.1) | ||||
Child and adolescent psychiatry nurses: personal-related burnout: 32.4 (14.5); work-related burnout: 28.1 (16.3); client-related burnout: 22.9 (15.7) | ||||||
Occupational Burnout Inventory | ||||||
Author(s) | Number of pediatric nurses | Results | ||||
Hsu et al. [52] | 5 | Mean = 60.00 (SD = 11.75) (scale is out of 90, higher = greater burnout) | ||||
Jacobs et al. [54] | 47 | Analysis of subgroup differences between nurses and non-nurses indicated a trend toward nurses reporting higher work-related burnout (39.92 vs. 35.86, P < .067) and patient-related burnout (23.88 vs. 18.96, P < .061). | ||||
Paunonen’s instrument | ||||||
Author(s) | Number of pediatric nurses | Results | ||||
Koivula et al. [57] | 21 | Mean = 6.15, SD = (0.71) (mild) | ||||
Popoff and Funkhouser’s survey of nurses (adapted version) | ||||||
Author(s) | Number of pediatric nurses | Personal Accomplishment subscale | ||||
Downey et al. [40] | 59 | PA mean = 1.0 (0.8) |