Skip to main content

Table 2 Median (and mean) orthotist/prosthetist age, proportion of workforce who were female, number and proportion who worked in a regional/remote location, and practitioner prevalence according to service location

From: The changing demographics of the orthotist/prosthetist workforce in Australia: 2007, 2012 and 2019

State

Age

Gender

Service location

Median (mean) practitioner age

Post -hoc

Proportion (%) female

Post -hoc

Number (proportion; %) of practitioners in a regional/remote location

Practitioner prevalence i.e., number of practitioners per 100,000 population

2007

2012

2019

2007

2012

2019

2007

2012

2019

2007

2012

2019

Metro

Regional/ remote

Metro

Regional/ remote

Metro

Regional/ remote

ACT

43 (43)

27 (33)

32 (35)

 

0

0

29

 

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0.58

0.00

0.80

0.00

1.64

0.00

NSW

49 (47)

48 (45)

34 (37)

ca, c

17

23

39

ca, b, c

2 (4)

2 (4)

7 (10)

0.91

0.11

0.85

0.11

1.18

0.40

NTa,b

 –

37 (37)

52.5 (53)

 

 –

0

0

 

–

2 (100a)

2 (100a)

–

–

N/A

0.85

N/A

0.81

QLD

44 (44)

34.5 (42)

33 (37)

 

22

18

42

c

4 (17)

3 (11)

9 (15)

0.75

0.25

0.88

0.17

1.52

0.50

SA

32 (38)

33 (36)

27 (33)

 

45

50

71

 

2 (10)

2 (10)

3 (10)

1.57

0.47

1.48

0.45

2.17

0.65

TASa

34.5 (39)

45 (44)

45 (44)

 

40

33

62

 

5 (100a)

9 (100a)

13 (100a)

N/A

1.01

N/A

1.76

N/A

2.43

VIC

38 (39)

34 (37)

37 (39)

 

36

49

53

ca

10 (14)

21 (17)

24 (13)

1.54

0.80

2.38

1.59

3.18

1.66

WA

42 (42)

47 (46)

34.5 (38)

 

45

31

47

 

1 (9)

1 (8)

0 (0)

0.62

0.20

0.64

0.18

1.46

0.00

Australia

41.5 (42)

37 (39)

35 (38)

ca

30

38

49

ca, c

13

16

14

1.06

0.38

1.29

0.60

1.92

0.84

  1. Metro.  metropolitan service location, ACT Australian Capital Territory, NSW New South Wales, NT Northern Territory, QLD Queensland, SA South Australia, TAS Tasmania, VIC Victoria, WA Western Australia
  2. aAll of the Northern Territory and Tasmania is considered regional/remote
  3. bThere were no AOPA members in the Northern Territory in 2007
  4. cSignificant main effect in the Kruskal Wallis H test or Pearson Chi Square test. Results of post-hoc testing: a = statistically significant difference between 2007 and 2019; b = statistically significant difference between 2007 and 2012; c = statistically significant difference between 2012 and 2019