Skip to main content

Table 1. Presence and form of availability of 27 information elements by 19 accrediting agencies, n (%)

From: Public availability of information from WFME-recognized accreditation agencies

  

Total

Document

Website text

Email request

Overall means

12.7 (67%)

8.5 (68%)

3.3 (25%)

0.9 (7%)

Agency structure

Internal aspects (e.g., membership qualifications and number)

17 (89%)

3 (18%)

14 (82%)

0 (0%)

External aspects (e.g., source of authority, relationships with other organizations)

19 (100%)

3 (16%)

16 (84%)

0 (0%)

Agency internal policies and resources

Conflicts of interest management

14 (74%)

12 (86%)

2 (14%)

0 (0%)

Record keeping

12 (63%)

10 (83%)

1 (8%)

1 (8%)

Financial, space, material, and human resources management

11 (58%)

7 (64%)

3 (27%)

1 (9%)

Standards for schoolsa

Content (e.g., topics covered, rigor, quality)

14 (74%)

12 (86%)

1 (7%)

1 (7%)

Process for development and/or revision (e.g., stakeholder input)

13 (68%)

10 (77%)

2 (15%)

1 (8%)

Self-study

Guidance provided by agency (e.g., templates, other support or consultation)

14 (74%)

10 (71%)

2 (14%)

2 (14%)

School process (e.g., participants, cost, duration)

14 (74%)

12 (86%)

1 (7%)

1 (7%)

Site visit by reviewers

Process (e.g., preparation, duration, activities)

14 (74%)

10 (71%)

2 (14%)

2 (14%)

Site visit team characteristics (e.g., demographics, training, expertise)

13 (68%)

8 (62%)

4 (31%)

1 (8%)

Site visit team’s report for agency

Content (e.g., synthesis of findings, recommendations)

13 (68%)

9 (69%)

2 (15%)

2 (15%)

Process (e.g., writing, medical school review)

14 (74%)

9 (64%)

3 (21%)

2 (14%)

Agency’s evaluation of schoola

Methods of reviewing information and communicating internally

14 (74%)

10 (71%)

3 (21%)

1 (7%)

Criteria and/or process (e.g., voting) for making summary decisions

13 (68%)

10 (77%)

2 (15%)

1 (8%)

School reports publicly availableb

6 (32%)

2 (33%)

4 (67%)

0 (0%)

Agency’s summary decision and recommendations

Types of summative decisions (e.g., full accreditation, probation, withdrawal)

14 (74%)

10 (71%)

3 (21%)

1 (7%)

Feedback for schools (e.g., recommendations for improvement, positive feedback)

12 (63%)

10 (83%)

1 (8%)

1 (8%)

External communications (e.g., public transparency, information for licensing bodies)

14 (74%)

10 (71%)

2 (14%)

2 (14%)

Managing appeals (e.g., timing, process)

14 (74%)

9 (64%)

4 (29%)

1 (7%)

Follow-up and monitoring

Follow-up intervals

12 (63%)

10 (83%)

2 (17%)

0 (0%)

Methods of data collection (e.g., school self-report, revisiting site)

13 (68%)

11 (85%)

2 (15%)

0 (0%)

Complaints

14 (74%)

8 (57%)

6 (43%)

0 (0%)

New schoolsa

Process of receiving initial accreditation (e.g., agency support, accreditation stages)

13 (68%)

10 (77%)

2 (15%)

1 (8%)

Differences in accreditation procedures for new versus existing schools

11 (58%)

9 (82%)

0 (0%)

2 (18%)

Fees

Fees for accreditationb

7 (37%)

4 (57%)

3 (43%)

0 (0%)

Fees for special servicesb

3 (16%)

2 (67%)

1 (33%)

0 (0%)

  1. aSome agencies refer to “programs” rather than “schools” as to what they accredit. Data include program or school based on agency terminology
  2. bDenotes one of the three items that were not felt to be mandatory and were not requested from agencies if not found on agency websites