From: Public availability of information from WFME-recognized accreditation agencies
 |  | Total | Document | Website text | Email request |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall means | 12.7 (67%) | 8.5 (68%) | 3.3 (25%) | 0.9 (7%) | |
Agency structure | Internal aspects (e.g., membership qualifications and number) | 17 (89%) | 3 (18%) | 14 (82%) | 0 (0%) |
External aspects (e.g., source of authority, relationships with other organizations) | 19 (100%) | 3 (16%) | 16 (84%) | 0 (0%) | |
Agency internal policies and resources | Conflicts of interest management | 14 (74%) | 12 (86%) | 2 (14%) | 0 (0%) |
Record keeping | 12 (63%) | 10 (83%) | 1 (8%) | 1 (8%) | |
Financial, space, material, and human resources management | 11 (58%) | 7 (64%) | 3 (27%) | 1 (9%) | |
Standards for schoolsa | Content (e.g., topics covered, rigor, quality) | 14 (74%) | 12 (86%) | 1 (7%) | 1 (7%) |
Process for development and/or revision (e.g., stakeholder input) | 13 (68%) | 10 (77%) | 2 (15%) | 1 (8%) | |
Self-study | Guidance provided by agency (e.g., templates, other support or consultation) | 14 (74%) | 10 (71%) | 2 (14%) | 2 (14%) |
School process (e.g., participants, cost, duration) | 14 (74%) | 12 (86%) | 1 (7%) | 1 (7%) | |
Site visit by reviewers | Process (e.g., preparation, duration, activities) | 14 (74%) | 10 (71%) | 2 (14%) | 2 (14%) |
Site visit team characteristics (e.g., demographics, training, expertise) | 13 (68%) | 8 (62%) | 4 (31%) | 1 (8%) | |
Site visit team’s report for agency | Content (e.g., synthesis of findings, recommendations) | 13 (68%) | 9 (69%) | 2 (15%) | 2 (15%) |
Process (e.g., writing, medical school review) | 14 (74%) | 9 (64%) | 3 (21%) | 2 (14%) | |
Agency’s evaluation of schoola | Methods of reviewing information and communicating internally | 14 (74%) | 10 (71%) | 3 (21%) | 1 (7%) |
Criteria and/or process (e.g., voting) for making summary decisions | 13 (68%) | 10 (77%) | 2 (15%) | 1 (8%) | |
School reports publicly availableb | 6 (32%) | 2 (33%) | 4 (67%) | 0 (0%) | |
Agency’s summary decision and recommendations | Types of summative decisions (e.g., full accreditation, probation, withdrawal) | 14 (74%) | 10 (71%) | 3 (21%) | 1 (7%) |
Feedback for schools (e.g., recommendations for improvement, positive feedback) | 12 (63%) | 10 (83%) | 1 (8%) | 1 (8%) | |
External communications (e.g., public transparency, information for licensing bodies) | 14 (74%) | 10 (71%) | 2 (14%) | 2 (14%) | |
Managing appeals (e.g., timing, process) | 14 (74%) | 9 (64%) | 4 (29%) | 1 (7%) | |
Follow-up and monitoring | Follow-up intervals | 12 (63%) | 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
Methods of data collection (e.g., school self-report, revisiting site) | 13 (68%) | 11 (85%) | 2 (15%) | 0 (0%) | |
Complaints | 14 (74%) | 8 (57%) | 6 (43%) | 0 (0%) | |
New schoolsa | Process of receiving initial accreditation (e.g., agency support, accreditation stages) | 13 (68%) | 10 (77%) | 2 (15%) | 1 (8%) |
Differences in accreditation procedures for new versus existing schools | 11 (58%) | 9 (82%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (18%) | |
Fees | Fees for accreditationb | 7 (37%) | 4 (57%) | 3 (43%) | 0 (0%) |
Fees for special servicesb | 3 (16%) | 2 (67%) | 1 (33%) | 0 (0%) |