Skip to main content

Table 4 Concordance correlations between sanctioned and WISN-based required HRH across states

From: Workforce problems at rural public health-centres in India: a WISN retrospective analysis and national-level modelling study

Centre-cadre combination N RC [95% CI] Bias correction factor
PHC-nurses 23 0.08 [0.01, 0.15] 0.15
PHC-doctors 24 0.85 [0.69, 0.93] 1
CHC-nurses 25 0.16 [0.07, 0.25] 0.21
CHC-GDMOs 25 0.63 [0.32, 0.82] 0.99
CHC-physicians 23 0.39 [0.22, 0.55] 0.49
CHC-surgeons 22 0.51 [0.33, 0.65] 0.56
CHC-OBGYNs 23 0.41 [0.24, 0.56] 0.49
CHC-paediatricians 23 0.4 [0.22, 0.55] 0.48
  1. N, number of states; RC, Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient. Bias correction factor of 1 depicts no deviation from line of perfect concordance