Workforce problems at rural public health-centres in India: a WISN retrospective analysis and national-level modelling study

Table 4 Concordance correlations between sanctioned and WISN-based required HRH across states

Centre-cadre combination	N	R_C [95% CI]	Bias correction factor
PHC-nurses	23	0.08 [0.01, 0.15]	0.15
PHC-doctors	24	0.85 [0.69, 0.93]	1
CHC-nurses	25	0.16 [0.07, 0.25]	0.21
CHC-GDMOs	25	0.63 [0.32, 0.82]	0.99
CHC-physicians	23	0.39 [0.22, 0.55]	0.49
CHC-surgeons	22	0.51 [0.33, 0.65]	0.56
CHC-OBGYNs	23	0.41 [0.24, 0.56]	0.49
CHC-paediatricians	23	0.4 [0.22, 0.55]	0.48

N, number of states; R_C, Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient. Bias correction factor of 1 depicts no deviation from line of perfect concordance

ISSN: 1478-4491