Skip to main content

Table 2 Geospatial analysis of influential variables that can affect severe acute malnutrition treatment coverage at the three largest districts of Kayes Region in Mali

From: Scaling severe acute malnutrition treatment with community health workers: a geospatial coverage analysis in rural Mali

 

aKita District % (95% CI) High supervision

bKayes District % (95% CI) Light supervision

cBafoulabé District % (95% CI) Not supportive supervision

Comparison*

(p value)

Overlap between areas covered by HFs and CHWs

48.7 (39.2–58.2)

55.8 (45.3–65.9)

30.9 (19.2–44.3)

a–b: < 0.001

a–c: < 0.001

b–c: < 0.001

Children 0–59 months without geographical access to a health provider

70.4 (70.1–70.6)

52.6 (52.3–52.8)

80.4 (79.9–80.8)

a–b: < 0.001

a–c: < 0.001

b–c: < 0.001

Children 0–59 months not covered by active screening

52.2 (51.9–52.5)

9.8 (9.6–10.0)

68.6 (68.0–69.1)

a–b: < 0.001

a–c: < 0.001

b–c: < 0.001

  1. The letters a, b and c refer to each of the districts to summarize which districts are being compared in the final comparison column
  2. CHWs: community health workers; HFs: health facilities