Skip to main content

Table 4 Types of impact assessment required or recommended by partner organizations

From: The roles and involvement of global health partners in the health workforce: an exploratory analysis

Focus topic for impact assessment

Multilaterals identified

Bilaterals identified

Funding support

Technical support

Environment and social

EIB [95]; World Bank [96]

OECD [91]; WHO [97]a

France [98]; Germany [99]; Japan [100]; Saudi Arabia [101]

Sustainability

OECD [91]; WHO [97]a

France [102, 103]; Germany [99]; Norway [104]; Saudi Arabia [101]

Development / aid quality or effectiveness

AfDB [105,106,107]; EIB [108]; Gavi [53]

Australia [109]; EC [110]

Gender equality

EIB [111]

OECD [112]

Canada [113]

Health

ADB [114]

WHO [115, 116]

EC [110]

Economy

EIB [117, 118]

 

Germany [99]

Employment

EIB [119]

 

EC [110]

Health workforce

Global Fund [46]

WHO [94, 120]

Risk mitigation

Canada [121]; UK [122]b

Social

EIB [95]

France [98]

Epidemiology

Global Fund [123]

Infrastructure

World Bank [124]

Poor and marginalized groups

Canada [125]

Regulation

OECD [126]

  1. aThe original search found an earlier version of this page, which is no longer available, so it was replaced with an updated link
  2. bIncluding risks of unintended consequences