Skip to main content

Table 3 The SWOT analysis of the Australian case

From: Regulating health professional scopes of practice: comparing institutional arrangements and approaches in the US, Canada, Australia and the UK

Strengths

Uniform legislation and regulatory authorities operating nationally provide consistent and clear practice standards and regulatory frameworks

Mobility of practitioners across internal borders

Flexible scope of practice to enable and respond to changing models of care

Increased public engagement through community reference group

Weaknesses

Complex internal arrangements

Conservative bias to regulation

Professional silos transferred into new model

Opportunities

Reforms emphasize interprofessional collaboration

Focus on evidence-informed risk-based regulation

Focus on greater inter-professional practice

National, standardized data fosters health workforce planning

Threats

Delivering successful cultural change required to be effective, contemporary, and relevant

Bigger political target