Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between the number of GP visits in the last two weeks and socio-demographic variables, relative risk ratios and their 95% CIs.

From: Access to general practitioner services amongst underserved Australians: a microsimulation study

Variables

Number of times GP consulted per fortnight

Overall p-value

 

One visit*

Two visits**

Three or more visits***

 

Age group

   

< 0.0001

15 - 19

0.39 (0.30, 0.49)

0.43 (0.26, 0.71)

0.60 (0.24, 1.52)

 

20 - 44

0.53 (0.46, 0.61)

0.55 (0.41, 0.75)

0.68 (0.40, 1.16)

 

45 - 64

0.63 (0.55, 0.73)

0.67 (0.50, 0.89)

0.68 (0.40, 1.17)

 

65 +

Reference

Reference

Reference

 

Sex

   

< 0.0001

Male

0.72 (0.66, 0.79)

0.70 (0.57, 0.87)

0.58 (0.38, 0.89)

 

Employment status

0.0064

Employed

0.78 (0.68, 0.89)

0.78 (0.58, 1.05)

0.96 (0.57, 1.63)

 

Unemployed (looking for work)

0.99 (0.74, 1.32)

1.17 (0.63, 2.18)

0.63 (0.19, 2.12)

 

Not in the labour force

Reference

Reference

Reference

 

Remoteness

   

< 0.0001

Inner regional

0.76 (0.68, 0.86)

0.84 (0.65, 1.08)

0.79 (0.50, 1.24)

 

Other regional

0.80 (0.70, 0.91)

0.96 (0.72, 1.27)

0.76 (0.43, 1.33)

 

Major cities

Reference

Reference

Reference

 

Personal income

   

0.5803

First tercile

1.12 (0.96, 1.30)

1.10 (0.78, 1.55)

1.14 (0.60, 2.16)

 

Second tercile

1.10 (0.97, 1.25)

1.16 (0.86, 1.56)

0.85 (0.49, 1.47)

 

Third tercile

Reference

Reference

Reference

 

Health status

   

< 0.0001

Exec/V Good

0.37 (0.33, 0.42)

0.20 (0.16, 0.26)

0.10 (0.06, 0.17)

 

Good

0.55 (0.48, 0.62)

0.28 (0.21, 0.36)

0.34 (0.22, 0.51)

 

Fair/Poor

Reference

Reference

Reference

 
  1. Bold relative risk ratios are statistically significant at 5% significance level.
  2. *Relative risk ratios of consulting GP one time compared to none
  3. **Relative risk ratios of consulting GP two times compared to none
  4. ***Relative risk ratios of consulting GP three or more times compared to none