Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Brigita Skela Savic |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Orvill Adams |
27 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Jamal |
4 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mary O'Neil |
19 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Brigita Skela Savic |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Brigita Skela Savic |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mary O'Neil |
24 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Orvill Adams |
11 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Jamal |
24 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Brigita Skela Savic |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
20 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
10 May 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-18 |
You can find further information about peer review here.