Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rene Lavallee |
10 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Harvey Whiteford |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Oonagh O'Brien |
22 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Harvey Whiteford |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Harvey Whiteford |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
29 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Oonagh O'Brien |
10 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rene Lavallee |
14 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Harvey Whiteford |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
16 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rene Lavallee |
5 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Harvey Whiteford |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
7 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.