From: The effects of performance appraisal in the Norwegian municipal health services: a case study
Variable N = | All respondent 371 | Nurse 171 | Auxiliary Nurse 163 | Subordinate 310 | Superior 55 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 Goal setting in PA - Learning | .24 (1.30) | .30 (3.71)*** | .64 (7.87) *** | .49 (9.00) *** | .20 (1.29) |
H2a Thorough feedback in PA - Learning | .20 (0.97) | .34 (4.00)*** | .06 (0.62) | .20 (3.56) *** | .20 (0.96) |
H2b Satisfied with feedback in PA - Learning | .26 (1.56)* | .20 (2.58)** | .16 (1.95)* | .20 (3.68)*** | .26 (1.58)* |
H3a Participate actively in PA - Learning | -.01 (-0.10) | -.05 (-0.95) | -.02 (-0.29) | -.03 (-0.51) | -.01 (-0.10) |
H3b Independence in PA - Learning | .01 (0.13) | -.03 (-0.57) | -.03 (-0.85) | .09 (0.76) | .09 (0.76) |
H4 Education/skills before PA - Learning | .20 (1.62)* | .09 (1.70)* | -.06 (-1.07) | .02 (0.59) | .19 (1.62)* |
H5 PA training -Learning | .03 (0.26) | -.07 (-1.21) | -.04 (-0.73) | -.08 (-2.24) | .03 (0.27) |
R2 | .47 | .62 | .66 | .60 | .17 |
The adjusted R2 | .36 | .60 | .64 | .65 | .02 |
Test of normality (Sig) | .15 | .15 | .15 | .15 | .15 |