Skip to main content

Table 2 Results from the multiple regression models for the probability of nursing and midwifery personnel to receive non-pecuniary benefits, six countries

From: Access to non-pecuniary benefits: does gender matter? Evidence from six low- and middle-income countries

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

Covariate

Meals

Housing

Transport

Paid vacation

Health insurance

In-service training

At least one benefit

Three or more benefits

Worker's sex:

-0.125

0.18

0.557**

-0.056

0.648***

-0.534***

0.325

0.089

Woman (ref = man)

[0.341]

[0.285]

[0.241]

[0.227]

[0.222]

[0.204]

[0.258]

[0.230]

Worker's years of experience at facility

-0.015

0

0.001

-0.014

0.018*

0.006

0.025*

0.002

 

[0.016]

[0.013]

[0.012]

[0.012]

[0.011]

[0.010]

[0.015]

[0.011]

Facility location:

-0.419

0.221

0.069

-0.545***

0.354***

0.115

0.535***

-0.176

Rural (ref = urban)

[0.256]

[0.155]

[0.139]

[0.105]

[0.089]

[0.081]

[0.118]

[0.110]

Facility type:

0.878***

0.34

0.456**

-0.201

0.409**

-0.821***

0.112

0.078

Hospital (ref = other)

[0.300]

[0.252]

[0.215]

[0.196]

[0.195]

[0.177]

[0.219]

[0.198]

Facility management: Private (ref = public)

-0.174

0.58

-0.082

-0.834***

-0.075

-0.976***

-0.940***

-0.455

 

[0.451]

[0.424]

[0.294]

[0.277]

[0.293]

[0.243]

[0.253]

[0.313]

Interaction sex*experience:

-0.007

0.001

-0.008

0.02

-0.016

0.001

-0.026

0.006

Woman*Years

[0.019]

[0.016]

[0.014]

[0.013]

[0.012]

[0.011]

[0.016]

[0.013]

Interaction sex*facility type:

0.112

-0.211

-0.600**

-0.012

-0.396*

0.633***

0.056

-0.222

Woman*Hospital

[0.372]

[0.306]

[0.258]

[0.238]

[0.228]

[0.213]

[0.275]

[0.241]

Interaction sex*facility management:

1.768***

0.116

1.213***

1.403***

-1.017***

0.507*

-0.058

1.052***

Woman*Private

[0.469]

[0.453]

[0.335]

[0.302]

[0.310]

[0.270]

[0.272]

[0.338]

  1. *P < 0.1 **P < 0.05 ***P < 0.01 ref = reference category
  2. Note: Additional variables for workers' country of residence and occupational earnings were included in the model, with generally highly statistically significant differences observed (results not presented, due in part to differences in currency scales across countries).