Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amélia Cumbi |
| 9 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Urassa |
| 15 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen de Pinho |
| 10 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amélia Cumbi |
| 13 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Urassa |
| 24 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 31 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 31 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 7 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 7 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4491-9-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.