Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological features of included studies

From: The impact of physician–nurse task shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review

Study

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Outcome

Sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding

Sample

Attrition, %

Funding

First author

Location

1ry

2ry

calc.

size

Fairall et al., 2012 [25]

ZA 2

A

A

d

e

≥200

<20

G

Fairall et al., 2012 [25]

ZA 1

A

A

d

e

≥200

≥20

G

Houweling et al., 2011 [27]

NL 3

I

A

NP

≥200

<20

G

Andryukhin et al., 2011 [18]

RU 1

  

U

I

c

e

<200

≥20

None

Dierick-van Daele et al., 2009 [24]

NL 2

  

A

A

NP

 

≥200

≥20

G

Chan et al., 2009 [22]

UK 6

  

A

A

b

<200

<20

nr

Hesselink et al., 2004 [26]

NL 1

a

U

U

b

≥200

≥20

nr

Denver et al., 2003 [23]

UK 5

a

I

I

NP

e

<200

<20

nr

Kernick et al., 2000 [28]

UK 4

 

A

U

U

e

<200

≥20

Ind.

Kinnersley et al., 2000 [34]

UK 3

A

A

NP

e

≥200

≥20

G

Shum et al., 2000 [32]

UK 2

  

A

A

NP

e

≥200

≥20

G

Campbell et al., 1998 [1921, 2931, 33]

UK 1

  

A

I

b

≥200

≥20

G

  1. Studies are listed by year (y) of publication, in decreasing order. A tick indicates the specific criteria fulfilled
  2. Blinding: whether patients, care providers and/or outcome assessors were blinded; UK: United Kingdom; NL: the Netherlands; ZA: South Africa; RU: Russia. I: inadequate; A: adequate; U: unclear; NP: not performed; G: government; Ind.: industry; P: private; nr: not reported
  3. aInclusion criteria only
  4. bBlinding of outcome assessors
  5. cSingle blinding
  6. dData analysts partly blinded
  7. eIntention to treat strategies to deal with missing data