Table 7 Multinomial logistic regression analysis of preferred general practice remuneration system
From: Young doctors’ preferences for payment systems: the influence of gender and personality traits
Odds ratio (95% CI)a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Combined n = 390 | Salary n = 163 | Don’t know n = 96 | Current (activity-based) n = 160 | |
Gender (0 = female, 1 = male) | 0.59 (0.40–0.88)** | 0.39 (0.24–0.63)*** | 0.34 (0.19–0.61)*** | Reference category |
Family (0 = no, 1 = yes) | Not included | Not included | Not included | |
Prestige score | Not included | Not included | Not included | |
Risk-prone index | 1.01 (0.97–1.02) | 0.97 (0.92–1.02) | 1.00 (0.95–1.06) | |
Status-oriented | 0.96 (0.82–1.11) | 0.90 (0.75–1.10) | 0.99 (0.80–1.24) | |
Income-oriented | 0.79 (0.65–0.95)* | 0.65 (0.51–0.81)*** | 0.60 (0.46–0.78)*** | |
Effort-tolerant | 0.74 (0.62–0.89)** | 0.65 (0.52–0.80)*** | 0.68 (0.53–0.87)** | |
Model fit information | Cox and Snell R2 = 0.114, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.124 | |||