Skip to main content

Table 7 Multinomial logistic regression analysis of preferred general practice remuneration system

From: Young doctors’ preferences for payment systems: the influence of gender and personality traits

  Odds ratio (95% CI)a  
  Combined n = 390 Salary n = 163 Don’t know n = 96 Current (activity-based) n = 160
Gender (0 = female, 1 = male) 0.59 (0.40–0.88)** 0.39 (0.24–0.63)*** 0.34 (0.19–0.61)*** Reference category
Family (0 = no, 1 = yes) Not included Not included Not included
Prestige score Not included Not included Not included
Risk-prone index 1.01 (0.97–1.02) 0.97 (0.92–1.02) 1.00 (0.95–1.06)
Status-oriented 0.96 (0.82–1.11) 0.90 (0.75–1.10) 0.99 (0.80–1.24)
Income-oriented 0.79 (0.65–0.95)* 0.65 (0.51–0.81)*** 0.60 (0.46–0.78)***
Effort-tolerant 0.74 (0.62–0.89)** 0.65 (0.52–0.80)*** 0.68 (0.53–0.87)**
Model fit information Cox and Snell R2 = 0.114, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.124
  1. aStatistically significant: *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01; ***: P < 0.001.