| Odds ratio for dependent variables (SE) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory variables | Salary | Occupational risk allowance | ||
 | Full model | Reduced model | Full model | Reduced model |
Years in position | 1.06 (0.02)*** | 1.06 (0.02)*** | 1.19 (0.04)*** | 1.20 (0.04)*** (p < 0.001) |
Kasai Occidental (vs Equateur) | 1.48 (0.69) | 1.46 (0.64) | 0.17 (0.07)*** | 0.17 (0.07)*** (p < 0.001) |
Kasai Orientale (vs Equateur) | 1.02 (0.89) | 0.71 (0.48) | 0.03 (0.02)*** | 0.05 (0.04)*** (p < 0.001) |
Maniema (vs Equateur) | 0.20 (0.13)** | 0.22 (0.14)*** (p = 0.014) | 1.56 (0.76) | 1.30 (0.63) |
Province Orientale (vs Equateur) | 0.69 (0.43) | 1.05 (0.52) | 11.07 (7.28)*** | 9.58 (6.33)*** (p = 0.001) |
Population served | 1.00 (0.00)** | 1.00 (0.00)** (p = 0.043) | 1.00 (0.00) |  |
Total personnel | 1.43 (0.25)** | Â | 0.94 (0.19) | Â |
Urban (vs rural) | 1.90 (0.86) | 2.48 (0.97)** (p = 0.021) | 2.42 (1.33) | 2.10 (0.91)* |
Number of services | 1.08 (0.12) | Â | 0.84 (0.09) | Â |
Distance of facility from village | 1.00 (0.03) | Â | 1.07 (0.04)* | Â |
Reference heath centre (vs heath centre) | 0.74 (0.36) | Â | 0.49 (0.24) | 0.39 (0.20)* |
Age | 1.02 (0.02) | Â | 1.03 (0.02) | Â |
Male (vs female) | 0.92 (0.31) | Â | 0.66 (0.24) | Â |
Number of dependents | 0.97 (0.03) |  | 1.11 (0.04)** | 1.12 (0.04)*** (p = 0.001) |
Married (vs not married) | 1.10 (0.14) | Â | 0.67 (0.12)** | 0.75 (0.12)* |
University (vs school education) | 0.77 (0.27) | Â | 1.07 (0.41) | Â |
ASSP programme | 0.70 (0.28) | Â | 0.58 (0.23) | Â |
Received occupational allowance (salary model only) | 1.03 (0.35) |  | – | – |
Received salary (occupational risk allowance model only) | – | – | 1.06 (0.39) |  |
Constant | 0.04 (0.05)** | 0.09 (0.04)*** | 0.37 (0.41) | 0.21 (0.08)*** |
Pseudo R 2 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.35 | 0.33 |
Model χ 2 | 50.90*** | 46.98*** | 91.22*** | 77.56*** |
Number observations (n) | 337 | 383 | 318 | 318 |