Strengths | Weaknesses |
• Deductive approach with a foundation of inductive approach to field inquiry. • Accurate measurement of time and better management of observation data by use of software based data collection tools. • Variations across settings (tribal, non-tribal) and cadres studied. • GPS enabled android-based app led to recording accurate movement in the field • Stringent field based monitoring and supportive supervision • A multi-disciplinary team of experts for technical guidance • Observing inter-departmental convergence | • Hawthorne effect • Inter-observer bias, due to big team of observers • Only male observers in the team, however no discomfort expressed by participants who were largely females. • Home to home follow up by a male was uncomfortable for few female workers because of social or cultural reasons • Malfunctioning of few tablets initially (two to three times in the first district). |
Opportunities | Threats |
• To capture best practices from the field to develop model work plan for FLHWs. • To identify policy implications and interventions for redefining job responsibilities of FLHWs. • Voicing the concerns of the lowest cadre that are unheard. | • Any punitive action against FLHWs, and ASHAs if the findings were not acceptable to higher administration. Although anonymity was maintained during reporting. |