Table 2 Course evaluation data
Participants evaluation | |
|---|---|
Instructor feedback | % |
Well-prepared for the course | 100 |
Knowledgeable in course content | 96.2 |
Communicated well course’s information | 92.9 |
Provided good connection between theory and practice | 96.1 |
Stimulated interest in the course | 92.5 |
Treated students positively | 100 |
Encouraged students to think independently | 96.3 |
Managed time class well | 96.5 |
Instructor’s general teaching effectiveness | 100 |
Course feedback | |
The courses objectives and requirements were clearly presented | 100 |
The set goals of the course were completed | 100 |
The course sequence was logical and appropriate | 92.6 |
The amount of work required for this course was relevant | 100 |
The course exercises and homework were related to the subject | 100 |
The speed of material presentation was appropriate | 96.3 |
I learned from this course something that I perceive as valuable | 96.5 |
The classroom discussions positively contributed to learning this course | 100 |
The course enhanced my interest in the topic it introduced | 100 |
Good Course quality in general | 96.2 |
Answers to open-ended questions | |
Feedback on instructors | Positive feedback on course instructors. Instructors possessed expertise in the course content, ability to provide support and encouragement, ability to lead group discussions, and ability to clearly communicate their knowledge |
Course expectations | Course met participant’s expectations. Participants acquired new health-related information |
Improvement suggestions | Need for more practical approaches throughout the courses. Calls for adding first aid courses, nursing courses, applied medical courses, wider-ranging courses tapping into more diverse health topics beyond women’s health. Expressed interest in having additional time for practical applications of the learnt material |