Skip to main content

Table 1 Physiotherapy workforce-to-population ratio, by sector and care level, in Brazil and regions. 2007 and 2016

From: The physiotherapy workforce in the Brazilian Unified Health Care System

Region

Year

Sector

Care level

Total

PHC

SHC

THC

Physiotherapist/1.000 population

%

Physiotherapist/1.000 population

%

Physiotherapist/1.000 population

%

Physiotherapist/1.000 population

%

 

Brazil

2007

Public

0.0249

11.5

0.0673

31.1

0.0488

22.5

0.1411

65.1

p = 0.0274a

Private

0.0005

0.2

0.0669

30.9

0.0084

3.9

0.0757

34.9

Total

0.0254

11.7

0.1342

61.9

0.0572

26.4

0.2168

100

 
 

p < 0.0001b

     
   

p < 0.0001c

   
 

p = 0.0660d

   

2016

Public

0.063

15.2

0.0896

21.6

0.1145

27.6

0.2671

64.4

p = 0.0209a

Private

0.0006

0.1

0.1282

30.9

0.0187

4.5

0.1474

35.6

Total

0.0636

15.3

0.2178

52.5

0.1331

32.1

0.4145

100

 
 

p < 0.0001b

     
   

p = 0.0420c

   
 

p = 0.1230d

   

North

2007

Public

0.0139

14.3

0.0309

32

0.0314

32.5

0.0762

78.8

p < 0.0001a

Private

0

0

0.0181

18.7

0.0025

2.5

0.0205

21.2

Total

0.0139

14.3

0.049

50.7

0.0339

35

0.0967

100

 
 

p = 0.0030b

     
   

p = 0.3690d

   
 

p = 0.1470d

   

2016

Public

0.0452

19

0.0527

22.2

0.0842

35.5

0.1821

76.7

p < 0.0001a

Private

0.0003

0.1

0.0516

21.7

0.0034

1.4

0.0554

23.3

Total

0.0455

19.2

0.1043

43.9

0.0877

36.9

0.2375

100

 
 

p = 0.0580a

     
   

p = 1.0000c

   
 

p = 0.2630d

   

Northeast

2007

Public

0.0163

10.1

0.0581

36.2

0.0454

28.3

0.1198

74.6

p = 0.0003a

Private

0.0002

0.1

0.0363

22.6

0.0044

2.7

0.0408

25.4

Total

0.0164

10.2

0.0944

58.8

0.0498

31

0.1606

100

 
 

p < 0.0001b

     
   

p = 0.0060c

   
 

p = 0.0630d

   

2016

Public

0.0788

22.2

0.0789

22.2

0,1126

31.7

0.2703

76.1

p < 0.0001a

Private

0.0008

0.2

0.0773

21.8

0,0065

1.8

0.0847

23.8

Total

0.0796

22.4

0.1562

44

0,1191

33.6

0.355

100

 
 

p = 0.1280a

     
   

p = 0.9170c

   
 

p = 0.8650d

   

Southeast

2007

Public

0.0326

12

0.079

29

0.0612

22.5

0.1728

63.5

p = 0.0394a

Private

0.0006

0.2

0.0845

31

0.0145

5.3

0.0996

36.5

Total

0.0332

12.2

0.1635

60

0.0756

27.8

0.2724

100

 
 

p < 0.0001b

     
   

p < 0.0001c

   
 

p = 0.0370d

   

2016

Public

0.0593

12.3

0.0933

19.4

0.1314

27.3

0.2839

59.1

p = 0.1564a

Private

0.0005

0.1

0.1592

33.2

0.0366

7.6

0.1963

40.9

Total

0.0598

12.4

0.2525

52.6

0.1679

35

0.4803

100

 
 

p < 0.0001b

     
   

p = 0.0600c

   
 

p = 0.0150d

   

South

2007

Public

0.0343

11.8

0.0971

33.4

0.0389

13.4

0.1703

58.5

p = 0.3463a

Private

0.0011

0.4

0.1153

39.6

0.0042

1.5

0.1207

41.5

Total

0.0354

12.2

0.2124

73

0.0431

14.8

0.2909

100

 
 

p < 0.0001b

     
   

p < 0.0001c

   
 

p = 1.0000d

   

2016

Public

0.0635

12.7

0.1351

27.1

0.0948

19.1

0.2933

58.9

p = 0.2607a

Private

0.0005

0.1

0.1967

39.5

0.0072

1.5

0.2044

41.1

Total

0.0639

12.8

0.3318

66.6

0.1021

20.5

0.4978

100

 
 

p < 0.0001b

     
   

p < 0.0001c

   
 

p = 0.8020d

   

Central-west

2007

Public

0.0213

9.3

0.0539

23.6

0.0575

25.2

0.1327

58.1

p = 0.2379a

Private

0.0077

3.4

0.0802

35.1

0.0079

3.4

0.0957

41.9

Total

0.029

12.7

0.1341

58.7

0.0653

28.6

0.2285

100

 
 

p < 0.0001b

     
   

p = 0.0010c

   
 

p = 0.0830d

   

2016

Public

0.057

14,4

0.0801

20.2

0.119

30.1

0,256

64,7

p = 0.0315a

Private

0.0101

2,5

0.1236

31.2

0.0062

1.6

0.1398

35,3

Total

0.067

16.9

0.2036

51.4

0.1252

31.6

0.3958

100

 
 

p = 0.0010a

     
   

p = 0.0860c

   
 

p = 0.3350d

   
  1. PHC, primary health care; SHC, secondary health care; THC, tertiary health care
  2. aAnova between public and private
  3. bAnova and Bonferroni correction between PHC and SHC level
  4. cAnova and Bonferroni correction between SHC and THC level
  5. dAnova and Bonferroni correction between PHC and THC level
  6. Values of p showing significant differences are represented in bold