Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality appraisal of the included studies

From: What is the impact of integrated care on the job satisfaction of primary healthcare providers: a systematic review

Included studies

Quantitative descriptive criteria

Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question?

Is the sample representative of the target population?

Are the measurements appropriate?

Is the risk of nonresponse bias low?

Is the statistical analysis appropriate to answer the research question?

Walter et al. (2019)

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Sheehan et al. (2013)

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Poot et al. (2016)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Haag et al. (2021)

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Farrar et al. (2001)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Selamu et al. (2019)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Waddimba et al. (2016)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Chen et al. (2021)

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

Zhou et al. (2022)

No

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Yes

Wang et al. (2023)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Jia et al. (2014)

Yes

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Dong et al. (2022)

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Wu et al. (2021)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

He et al. (2021)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Qualitative criteria

 

Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question?

Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question?

Are the findings adequately derived from the data?

Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data?

Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis, and interpretation?

Mutemwa et al. (2013)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Vickers et al. (2013)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rodríguez et al. (2018)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Mixed methods criteria

 

Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed-methods design to address the research question?

Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question?

Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted?

Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed?

Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved?

Purcell et al. (2018)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unsure

Kaitz et al. (2021)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Kool et al. (2008)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Jin et al. (2019)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Zhang (2022)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Zhou et al. (2018)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Zhang et al. (2022)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Wang (2017)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ti (2019)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ma et al. (2018)

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Lin (2018)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Deng et al. (2021)

Yes

No

No

Yes

No