Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The trend of feminization of doctors’ workforce in Oman: is it a phenomenon that could rouse the health system?

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Human Resources for Health201816:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-018-0283-y

Received: 17 August 2017

Accepted: 17 April 2018

Published: 27 April 2018

Abstract

Background

Participation of women in the medical profession over several countries worldwide was increased over the past decades. This paper is a part of ongoing studies aiming at addressing the issue of health workforce feminization among doctors in the Sultanate of Oman as well as exploring the health system readiness in dealing with this phenomenon.

Methods

Literature in addition to reports and records of the Ministry of Health, Oman (MoH), Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) and Oman Medical Specialty Board were reviewed regarding the gender of the doctors and the medical students.

Results

Findings regarding the medical students at the SQU showed higher number of females compared to males (64% females in 2015 compared to 54% in 2009). A similar trend was observed regarding the postgraduates as 61.5% of the graduated residents doctors were females.

As for active workforce, the MoH 2015 report revealed that female doctors represent 42% of the total doctors compared to 27% in 1990. It increased 4% from 1990 to 2000, doubled to 8% from 2000 to 2010. The proportion of specialized female doctors reached 31% in 2015 compared to 21% in 1990. There were also gender variations among specialities. The proportion of female general practitioners reached 50% in 2015 compared to 30% in 1990 (4% increase every 5 years).

Conclusions

The feminization phenomenon in Oman is increasing and requires more attention in order to assess the health system readiness of meeting the needs and accommodating the females as the main care providers. The trend is expected to have important consequences on future planning, given that women doctors differ from men in how they participate in the workforce. It may also potentially contribute to a shortage in supply due to difference in preferences and consequently affect the skill-mix and productivity. The cultural, social context and dimensions need to be explored and feasible options to be provided for better planning.

Keywords

  • Feminization
  • Phenomenon
  • Doctors
  • Health workforce
  • Oman

Background

It has been observed over the past decades and intensified over the past few years in many countries over the globe that there are consistent trends of increased participation of females in the medical profession (the so-called feminization of medicine) and that the profession of medicine is not dominated by males as before [1]. The notion of feminization of a profession signifies a variety of meanings. In much of the literature, a profession is feminized when women constitute the majority of its practitioners [2]. However, some authors identified other meanings: those who recognize certain attributes as uniquely feminine (such as empathy, relatedness, nurturance and collectiveness are recognized, valued and expressed in the performance of professional tasks and functions) regard the profession as feminized. Then there is the feminist premise that a profession becomes feminized not by stereotypic attribution of gender qualities, but when its practice and substantive rules adapt and change in such a manner that women who enter the profession do not have to conform to a male model of what it means to be a professional [2, 3]. This paper considers feminization as the increased participation of women in the profession.

Females now comprise a majority or near-majority of medical students and predominate in certain specialities in many high-income countries [4]. For example, in the United States of America, 48% of medical students were women in 2013–2014, up from just 7% in 1965–1966 and women now account for more than half of graduate trainees in seven specialities. Similar trends are found across the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and various European countries [4].

The proportion of female doctors in countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) grew by nearly 16% between 1990 and 2013 [5]. In 2013, 45% of doctors on average across OECD countries were females, up from 38% in 2000 and 29% in 1990. At least half of all doctors now are females in 10 countries, ranging from 50% such as in Spain and Netherland, to 74% as in Estonia [5]. By contrast, about one-in-five doctors in Japan and Korea were females in 2013 [5]. Females are representing an increasing proportion of the physician workforce in low- and middle-income countries. However, the phenomenon is generally less well studied [4].

Concerning the Arab and Gulf countries, there were few published data found regarding feminization of medical workforce. A study in Sudan has shown that the proportion of female medical students has increased up to 69.5% forming almost 64.7% of the total graduates in the period 2000–2009 [6]. While for the total health workforce, there was slight dominance of females (51%) but with increasing trend as illustrated in the national human resources for health strategic plan 2012–2016 [7].

The Health Workforce 2030 Global Strategy [8] has reaffirmed that health workforce will be critical to achieving health and wider sustainable development goals (SDGs). The health targets under consideration in the SDGs include a renewed focus on equity and universal health coverage [8]. This can be attained through substantive and strategic investments in health workforce for both males and females. Improving health services coverage and health outcomes are much dependent on the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality human resources for health [8, 9].

The Sultanate of Oman is located in the south eastern corner of the Arabian Peninsula. Administratively, the country is divided into 11 governorates and 61 districts, locally known as (Wilayats) distributed among these governorates. The population size in 2015 was 4 159 102 of whom 43.6% were non-Omani [10].

Oman has achieved universal health coverage through dramatic transformation in its health care system over a remarkably short span of time [11]. The country is being recognized internationally as one of the few countries with successful experience in health development. For instance, the World Health Organization (WHO), in its first-ever comparative analysis of health systems in 2000, ranked Oman first among 191 countries for its overall performance on the level of health [12]. In 2010, the United Nation Development Programme (UNDP) identified top mover countries relative to the starting point in 1970s regarding health development and ranked Oman first among 135 countries worldwide as the most improved nation during the preceding 40 years [13].

A remarkable success has been achieved in evolving policies and plans for controlling and eradicating major communicable diseases [10]. The health indicators in 2015 showed a remarkable reduction in childhood mortality. For instance, the under-five and infant mortality became 11.4 and 9.5 per 1000 live birth compared to 86 and 64 per 1000 life birth in 1980 [10]. Furthermore, the life expectancy at birth reached 76.4 years in 2015 compared to 57.5 years in 1980 [10].

As for the health workforce, the density of doctors and nurses per population in Oman has increased remarkably. As for doctors, it reached 21.4 per 10 000 population in 2015 compared to 5.1 in 1980, while for the nurses, it reached 46.3 per 10 000 population compared to 10.8 in 1980 [10]. However, both densities are still below the OECD average which is 33 doctors per 10 000 population and 91 nurses per 10 000 population in 2015) [5].

Oman continued to develop its educational infrastructure and began to produce as much workforce as possible, in order to meet health care demands and achieve workforce self-reliance.

Different initiatives with a beneficial impact on the workforce development were introduced in the past decades such as the regionalization of health professions’ training institutes, active collaboration with universities and overseas speciality boards, qualitative improvement of the education system and the development of a strong continuing professional development system [14]. The workforce management system treats both males and females health professions on equal footing and there is no discrimination in terms of recruitment, deployment, remuneration, and professional development.

Notably, the health system in Oman is facing a major epidemiologic transition whereby the non-communicable diseases (NCDs) manifested as real burden that will strain the health system if not adequately addressed [11]. The health system in Oman recognized that having the best talented, motivated and competent health care professionals are very critical in addressing the system challenges, tackling the burden of diseases and sustaining universal health coverage through provision of quality health care services [15].

Since the year 2012, the Ministry of Health in Oman has embarked on a vigorous process of modernizing the health system aiming at improving the quality of care and sustaining the health gains. The process yields the development of long-term strategic document “Health Vision 2050” which resembles a landmark in health system development that encompassed almost all issues related to health [11].

The present paper is a part of ongoing studies aiming at addressing the issue of health workforce feminization among doctors in the Sultanate of Oman as well as exploring the health system readiness in dealing with this phenomenon based on Oman Health Vision 2050, Health Workforce 2030 Global Strategy and SDGs and Universal Health Coverage. The studies will be undertaken one by one under subtitles to the main title mentioned in the paragraph above.

The current study is specifically aiming at studying the trend of feminization among medical doctors’ workforce in the Sultanate of Oman and their distribution at work places according to their sexes among the different specialities.

Methods

The researchers conducted a review of the literature to study the global trend of female’s participation in the medical profession. A literature search by the authors was conducted for publications on feminization of medical staff over the world and in the Gulf Council Cooperation (GCC) region using MEDLINE®. MEDLINE® searches were carried out via PubMed® in the month of July 2017. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports were also included. Two search strategies were adopted one based on the use of appropriate Medical Subjects’ Headings (MeSH) and the second based on text words (free-text searching) for maximal retrieval of relevant articles. The following search terms were used alone or in combination in both strategies: doctors, female doctor, women doctors, men doctors, feminization of medical workforce, health care providers, medical workforce, feminization among medical students, Arab world and Oman. The reference lists from retrieved articles and their citing articles (identified through Scopus®) were scanned to identify additional relevant papers. Basic and clinical research papers, systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to gender of doctors and other medical staffs were included. Non-original publications including reviews, case reports, commentaries, letters and editorials were excluded. Only articles written in English were included in the study. The former cut-off (January 1990 to December 2016) was set to allow for maximum capture of published articles from GCC countries. A 1 year was considered a reasonable lag-time for any submitted manuscripts to be published in full-text.

Furthermore, a review of reports and records regarding the human resources and gender of the health care workers, specifically the doctors, and the medical students in Oman was performed. These data and information were retrieved from the annual statistics of the Ministry of Health (MoH) which is the main provider of health care in the Sultanate of Oman, the Oman Medical Specialty Board (OMSB) which was established in 2005 and mandated to spearhead the development of postgraduate residency programmes in Oman, and Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) which is the sole government institution that graduates medical doctors. Data of MoH were obtained on 5-year interval from 1990 till 2015, while for OMSB since it is established in 2005 whenever possible. This was followed by trend analysis of feminization of health workforce. The data were entered into excel sheet, and descriptive analysis was performed. SPSS Version 19 (IBM) was also used.

Results

Feminization of medical students in Oman

The findings regarding feminization of medical students in Oman from the period of 2009 to 2015 showed that the number of female medical students was higher than that of male medical students in SQU. For instance, 64% of the enrolled medical students in 2015 where females compared to 54% in 2009 as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

The number and percentage of males and females students in SQU during 2009 to 2015

Year

Enrolled students males

Enrolled students females

Total

 

No.

%

No.

%

 

2009

61

46

72

54

133

2010

59

37

102

63

161

2011

64

36

116

64

180

2012

54

33

112

67

166

2013

56

36

100

64

156

2014

56

36

99

64

155

2015

55

36

98

64

153

Feminization among residency training programme doctors

A similar trend has been observed regarding the residency training programme doctors. The training programmes for the resident doctors are organized by the OMBS. The average intake of OMSB is 150 residents per year in the different speciality programmes. Figure 1 shows the number of accepted residents out of the total applicants per year since 2010 to 2016.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

The number of applicants and accepted doctors to OMSB out of the total applicants per year since 2010 to 2016

The analysis by gender since the academic year 2006/2007 to 2015/2016 showed the dominance of females alongside a rising trend as shown in Fig. 2.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

The number of accepted residents in the college of medicine in SQU per gender per year from 2006 to 2016

Gender of applicants to the OMSB programme versus choice of speciality of medical field

It has been noticed that female doctors comprised 62.5% on average out of the total pool of applicants with differences in preferences among specialities. For instance, the higher number of applicants for internal medicine, family medicine, paediatrics and dermatology were female doctors, while the applicants for orthopaedics and oral and maxillofacial surgery was higher among male doctors. Details are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Number of applicants in different specialities of medicine from 2010 to 2017

Programmes

Number of applicants per gender per year

Total

2010–2011

2011–2012

2012–2013

2013–2014

2014–2015

2015–2016

2016–2017

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

Total

Anaesthesia

7

2

1

5

2

2

4

2

1

2

4

6

0

1

19

20

39

Biochemistry

1

0

0

0

1

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

4

3

10

13

Dermatology

2

19

5

19

8

26

9

7

1

8

0

0

2

14

27

93

120

Emergency medicine

15

5

13

8

9

10

6

12

6

4

4

9

6

8

59

56

115

E.N.T.

2

3

2

3

2

3

3

9

3

5

4

4

2

10

18

37

55

Family medicine

11

25

22

40

21

38

13

31

24

46

22

45

6

42

119

267

386

General surgery

9

2

21

7

12

7

11

11

6

3

7

6

8

11

74

47

121

Haematology

0

0

1

13

1

3

0

3

1

2

2

2

1

9

6

32

38

Histopathology

0

10

0

0

2

1

0

0

4

9

1

8

0

10

7

38

45

Internal medicine

6

3

10

10

14

13

11

16

14

13

13

13

10

9

78

77

155

Medical microbiology

3

1

0

0

4

4

0

0

0

3

0

3

1

11

8

22

30

Obst and Gyne

0

11

0

13

0

5

0

7

0

7

0

7

0

5

0

55

55

Ophthalmology

5

8

8

15

6

13

6

9

4

3

4

5

1

5

34

58

92

Orthopaedics

0

0

15

3

20

0

13

1

12

1

5

0

5

1

70

6

76

Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS)

0

0

0

2

4

0

2

0

2

2

4

1

3

3

15

8

23

Paediatrics

12

18

8

24

5

30

12

24

10

12

9

20

9

22

65

150

215

Psychiatry

8

12

3

12

4

3

3

7

3

5

2

5

7

7

30

51

81

Radiology

13

18

7

21

5

8

4

5

1

7

3

10

3

23

36

92

128

Sub-total

94

137

116

195

120

172

97

144

92

132

84

144

65

195

668

1119

 

Total

231

311

292

241

224

228

260

1787

The gender distribution of the pool of applicants per year is shown in Fig. 3. The percentage of female doctors’ applicants increased from 59.3% in 2010/2011 to 63.2% in 2015/2016 and it reached 75% in 2016/2017, while the number of male applicants is steadily declining.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

The number of applicants to OMSB per gender per year since 2010 to 2017

Accepted applicants by OMSB by gender and speciality

The same trend was observed among residents who are currently enrolled in the various OMSB speciality programmes as shown in Table 3. The gender distribution for the accepted doctors is 56% females and 44% males as shown in Fig. 4, while Fig. 5 shows the distribution of residents by gender in different specialities.
Table 3

Number and percentages of accepted residents by OMSB per gender per speciality

Speciality

Frequency

Percentage

Male

Female

Anaesthesia

12

6.9

3

9

Dermatology

3

1.7

2

1

Emergency medicine

4

2.3

0

4

ENT

6

3.4

4

2

Family medicine

37

21.3

13

24

General surgery

2

1.1

2

0

Haematology

8

4.6

4

4

Histopathology

1

0.6

1

0

Internal Medicine

39

22.4

21

18

Microbiology

3

1.7

0

3

OBS and GYN

11

6.3

0

11

Ophthalmology

4

2.3

3

1

Oral and maxillofacial surgery

3

1.7

2

1

Orthopaedics

10

5.7

10

0

Paediatrics

16

9.2

4

12

Psychiatry

9

5.2

4

5

Radiology

6

3.4

4

2

Total

174

100.0

77 (44%)

97 (56%)

Figure 4
Fig. 4

The number of accepted residents by OMSB per gender

Figure 5
Fig. 5

Distribution of OMSB residents in different specialities versus gender

As illustrated in Fig. 5, the specialities of family medicine, paediatrics, internal medicine, and obstetrics and gynaecology are highly occupied by female doctors while the other specialities are almost equally occupied by male and female doctors with no great variation.

Distribution of graduated residents by gender in different specialities

Table 4 illustrates the distribution of graduated residents by gender from 2006/2007 until 2014/2015. It is also shown that female doctors constitute 61.5% of the total OMSB graduated residents. In addition, 8 out of the 17 specialities demonstrated in the table were dominated by female doctors.
Table 4

Distribution of graduated residents by gender in different specialities

Programme

2006/2007–2009/2010

2010/2011–2014/2015

Total (2006/2007–2014/2015)

M

F

M

F

M

F

Anaesthesia

0

2

8

6

8

8

Paediatrics

8

24

18

32

26

56

Dermatology

8

10

4

10

12

20

Emergency medicine

5

6

17

13

22

19

ENT

3

2

7

4

10

6

Family medicine

13

36

22

36

35

72

General surgery

2

2

8

5

10

7

Internal medicine

10

7

30

16

39

23

Microbiology

1

2

0

7

1

9

Obst and Gyne

0

2

0

14

0

16

Psychiatry

0

7

8

20

8

27

Haematology

0

2

4

1

4

3

Histopathology

1

2

1

9

2

11

Radiology

2

3

8

13

10

16

Biochemistry

0

0

0

6

0

6

OMFS

0

0

1

1

1

1

Ophthalmology

1

3

1

3

Total

53 (33%)

107 (67%)

137 (41.1%)

196 (58.9%)

190 (38.5%)

303 (61.5%)

Feminization among medical doctors within the Ministry of Health in Oman

While the proportion of the female medical students in SQU and in female doctors in OMSB has increased over the last years, the same happened in the active workforce. The Ministry of Health (MoH) 2015 annual report revealed that female doctors represented 42% of the total doctors’ workforce compared to 27% in 1990 as shown in Fig. 6.
Figure 6
Fig. 6

Feminization among medical doctors within the Ministry of Health in Oman

Distribution of doctors’ workforce in the Ministry of Health

As for the specialists and consultants workforce in the MoH, the proportion of female doctors has reached 31% of the total specialists and consultants in 2015 compared to 21% in 1990 as illustrated in Fig. 7. Also, the percentage of female specialists and consultants working in senior management posts has increased steadily from 0% in 1990 to 30% in 2013.
Figure 7
Fig. 7

Distribution of specialists and consultant doctors by gender in the MoH

Distribution of MoH specialists and consultants

As shown in Table 5, female specialists and consultants were more in obstetrics and gynaecology, family and community medicine, biochemistry and dermatology. While in the contrary, they were below 10% in specialities like general surgery, orthopaedics, ENT, cardiothoracic surgery, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, nephrology and cardiology. This variation is comparable with the OMSB residents.
Table 5

Distribution of MOH specialists and consultants per gender and speciality, in the year 2015

Speciality

Male

Female

Total

Speciality

Male

Female

Total

General surgery

191

7

198

Dermatology

27

30

57

Orthopedics

122

3

125

Psychiatry

41

12

53

Urology

15

1

16

Oncology

19

13

32

Cardiothoracic surgery

25

0

25

General pediatrics

160

73

233

Plastic surgery/burns

31

0

31

Neonatology

13

2

15

Neurosurgery

19

1

20

Obst. and gynecology

0

222

222

Pediatric surgery

33

9

42

Pathology/haematology

17

20

37

Anesthesiology

206

40

246

Biochemistry

2

6

8

Ophthalmology

97

31

128

Radiology/radio-diagnosis

69

27

96

ENT

85

9

94

Microbiology

11

13

24

Internal medicine

183

41

224

Family and com. health

28

38

66

Cardiology

54

4

58

Public health

16

19

35

Nephrology

57

4

61

Epidemiology

20

3

23

Gastroenterology

10

1

11

Hospital administration

16

1

17

While for the general practitioners (GPs) in the MoH, the proportion of females has reached 50% of the total GPs in 2015 compared to 30% in 1990 while the number of male GPs was at higher level to the female GPs before declining to 50% in 2015 as illustrated in Fig. 8.
Figure 8
Fig. 8

Distribution of MoH general practitioners by gender

Discussion

It is evident from the findings in this study that the feminization of medical doctors in Oman is steadily rising. The percentage of female doctors in MoH has increased by 4% from 1990 to 2000, while it doubled (8%) from 2000 to 2010, and for the GPs particularly, the rise was nearly 4% every 5 years interval. In general, the number of female medical students in Oman is higher than that of the male medical students and the number of applicants and accepted postgraduate doctors for the speciality training programmes was higher among women doctors than men doctors.

The same trend has been observed in many countries. In high-income countries, the number of women entering medical education is superior to that of men [16]. In the Netherlands in 2008, 65% of medical students were females, while in the United States of America in 2007, 49% of medical students are females, compared to only 13% female medical students in 1970 [17]. Some researchers have argued that the roots of the phenomenon are in the changing features of the profession that make it no longer attractive to males as before [2, 18], while there has been greater access to medical training for female students [18]. The medicine graduation courses already had majority of females in several countries, such as England, Ireland and Norway in the 1990s [19]. In several industrialized countries, the proportion of primary care doctors who are females has nearly doubled over the last 30 years [20]. In Canada, 60% of family practice trainees are females and the number of female doctors increased by nearly 23% between 2007 and 2011 compared to a 9% increase in the number of male doctors during the same period of time. Furthermore, in Switzerland, the proportion of female physicians has doubled over the past decades as it increased from 17% in 1980s to 36% in 2010 [21]. A study in Brazil showed that since 2009, females constituted higher numbers than males among the new registered doctors, although males still prevail 60% in the active physician population in the group aged less than 29 years old [19].

The MOH statistics in Oman revealed that the proportion of female doctors among the senior hospital administration was less than 6%. The same was observed in Switzerland whereby the proportion of females among the senior medical staff in hospitals was as less than 10% [21].

According to the OECD, changes in the extent of female participation can have important consequences for the planning of the supply of health care human resources, given that female health care workers tend to differ from males in how they participate in the workforce [22]. In Oman, evidence is required to be made available on whether female doctors differ from male counterparts in terms of the soft skills that males and females bring into a work environment.

As shown in this study and beyond the feminization trend in Oman, there are still marked difference in the preferences among medical specialities both in postgraduates and active doctors workforce, i.e. some specialities were preferred and dominant by females, e.g. family medicine, paediatrics, biochemistry, psychiatry and microbiology, in addition to the obstetrics and gynaecology. On the contrary, orthopaedics and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OFMS) were preferred by males. A study to examine the speciality career choice of applicants to postgraduate training programmes in the United Arab Emirates noted statistically significant differences between gender in career preferences with more females preferring family medicine, paediatrics, dermatology and obstetrics, while the male preferred general surgery, radiology, emergency medicine and urology [23]. Also, literature search on gender differences in medical students’ speciality preferences showed that surgery is predominantly preferred by males and gynaecology, paediatrics and general practice by females [24]. In the context of Oman, an in-depth study is required to examine the preferences among medical specialities.

These variations may potentially contribute to a shortage in service supply due to difference in preferences. Specialities with very low rates of female participation may experience critical shortages in the future. In addition, the uneven distribution across medical specialities has its ramification on the work-related conditions such as skill-mix imbalance, types of contracts, increased risk of stress-related suffering, burnout and productivity [20, 21]. In Scotland, there have been concerns that such a change may lead to increased part-time working and subsequently to a fall in available general practice manpower despite an apparently rising overall number of general practitioners [25].

The feminization of the medical workforce is expected to become more important and could rouse an alarm to the health system in Oman if not well prepared to cope with this phenomenon in the future. Some countries like Sudan has dedicated a special strategy that focused on developing a female-friendly policy for jobs in the underserved areas as sated in the national human resources for health strategic plan 2012–2016 [7].

Conclusions

The number and percentage of female medical workforce in Oman is progressively increasing. Although it is not an inconvenient situation, however, it might be if not tackled appropriately. The authors are emphasizing that the feminization phenomenon of medical workforce in Oman requires more attention in order to assess the health system capability and readiness of meeting the needs and accommodating the females as the main care providers.

Evidence is required to be made available for the decision makers in order to measure the implications of the feminization of the health workforce in a country like Oman, bearing in mind the cultural, social context and fabric, and explore the options to provide adequately and timely interventions whenever required. It is also important to study and compare the overall career duration, working patterns and conditions, engagement in public and private sectors, practice style, as well as level of productivity among male and female physicians, and whether there is a need to adjust the health human resources modeling and planning, public health, patient care and management policies. The coming studies of this series will cover most of the areas mentioned above.

Abbreviations

GPs: 

General practitioners

MoH: 

Ministry of Health

NCDs: 

Non-communicable diseases

OECD: 

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

OFMS: 

Oral and maxillofacial surgery

OMSB: 

Oman Medical Specialty Board

SDGs: 

Sustainable development goals

SPSS: 

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

SQU: 

Sultan Qaboos University

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors graciously thank the Ministry of Health of the Sultanate of Oman and in particular Dr. Ali Al-Hinai (the Undersecretary of Planning Affairs) for his constant guidance and encouragement.

Availability of data and materials

  • The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

  • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Authors’ contributions

Dr. NAM, as the principal author, made substantial contributions to the conception, design, and acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data and involved in drafting and revising the manuscript. Dr. NNA made substantial contributions to literature review, and analysis and interpretation of data and involved in drafting and revising the manuscript. Dr. AAAl-M made substantial contributions acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data related to OMSB and SQU. Dr. NRAl-L involved in the data analysis and interpretation, as well as revising the manuscript. Dr. AMAl-Q contributed to the study design, identifying the sources of data, revising the manuscript, supervising the work and giving the final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study did not involve human subjects, human material or human data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ministry of Health, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
(2)
Oman Medical Specialty Board, Al Khoudh, Sultanate of Oman

References

  1. World Health Organization (2006). The world health report 2006. Working together for health. http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en/. Last accessed July 2017.Google Scholar
  2. Ncayiyana DJ. Feminisation of the South African medical profession—not yet nirvana for gender equity. S Afr Med J. 2011;101(1):5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Menkel-Meadow C. Feminization of the legal profession—the comparative sociology of women lawyers. In: Abel RL, PSC L, editors. Lawyers in society—comparative theories. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1996. p. 196.Google Scholar
  4. Bedoya-Vaca R, Derose KP, Romero-Sandoval N. Gender and physician specialization and practice settings in Ecuador: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:662. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-016-1917-1. Last accessed July 2017View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. OECD. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2015-en Google Scholar
  6. Mohamed IN, Abdelraheem MB, Abdullah MA. Sudanese female doctors in pediatrics. Sudan J Paediatr. 2012;12(2):36–43.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Federal MOH Sudan (2012). National human resources for health strategic plan for Sudan 2012–2016. http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/countries/Sudan_HRHPlan_2012-16.pdf. Last accessed July 2017.Google Scholar
  8. World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030. Geneva: WHO; 2016. http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/pub_globstrathrh-2030/en/. Last accessed July 2017Google Scholar
  9. Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, David B, Dussault G, Fogstad H, Fronteira I, Lozano R, Nyonator F, Pablos-Méndez A, Quain EE, Starrsj A, Tangcharoensathien V. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:853–63. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.118729 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Ministry of Health, the Sultanate of Oman (2015). Annual health report 2015. https://www.moh.gov.om/en/web/statistics/annual-reports. Last accessed July 2017.Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of Health, the Sultanate of Oman, 2014. Oman health vision 2050. https://www.moh.gov.om/en/web/directorate-general-of-planning/resources. Last accessed July 2017.Google Scholar
  12. World Health Organization. The world health report 2000. Health systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. 92 4 256198XGoogle Scholar
  13. United Nations Development Programme (2010). Human development report 2010. Second printing, November 2010. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/270/hdr_2010_en_complete_reprint.pdf. Last accessed July 2017.Google Scholar
  14. Ghosh B. Health workforce development planning in the Sultanate of Oman: a case study. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7(1):47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ministry of Health, the Sultanate of Oman (2015). Synopsis of strategic studies, volume 1, may 2015. https://www.moh.gov.om/documents/16506/119833/Synopsis+of+Strategic+Studies/a18796c8-c998-4e8b-9c8f-3fbd87017cff. Last accessed July 2017.Google Scholar
  16. Russo G, Gonçalves L, Craveiro I, Dussault G. Feminization of the medical workforce in low-income settings; findings from surveys in three African capital cities. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Maiorova T, Stevens F, van der Zee J, Boode B, Scherpbier A. Shortage in general practice despite the feminisation of the medical workforce: a seeming paradox? A cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:262. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/262. Last accessed July 2017View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaneto C, Toyokawa S, Inoue K, Kobayashi Y. Gender difference in physician workforce participation in Japan. Health Policy. 2009;89(1):115–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Scheffer MC, Cassenote AJF. The feminization of medicine in Brazil. Rev Bioét (Impr). 2013;21(2):266–75.Google Scholar
  20. Hedden L, Barer ML, Cardiff K, McGrail KM, Law MR, Bourgeault IL. The implications of the feminization of the primary care physician workforce on service supply: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12:32. http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/12/1/32. Last accessed July 2017View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD/WHO. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland: OECD Publishing. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264120914-en
  22. Danon-Hersch N, Paccaud F. Future trends in human resources for health care: a scenario analysis. Lausanne: University Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine; 2005. (Raisons de santé, 110). https://www.iumsp.ch/Publications/pdf/rds110_en.pdf. Last accessed July 2017Google Scholar
  23. Ibrahim H, Nair SC, Shaban S, El-Zubeir M. Reducing the physician workforce crisis: career choice and graduate medical education reform in an emerging Arab country. Educ Health. 2016;29:82–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Alers M, van Leerdam L, Dielissen P, Lagro-Janssen A. Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature review. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3:163–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-014-0132-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. McKinstry B, Colthart I, Elliott K, Hunter C. The feminization of the medical work force, implications for Scottish primary care: a survey of Scottish general practitioners. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:56. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/56. Last accessed July 2017View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement