Skip to main content

Malaysian Medical Students’ Career Intention (MMSCI): a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

In recent years, there have been many instances of negative sentiments expressed by and resignations observed from doctors working in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Malaysia. However, little is known about the perspectives of medical students and their career intentions. This study aims to determine the current Malaysian medical students’ career intentions immediately after graduation and upon completing the 2 years of housemanship and to establish the factors influencing these intentions.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 859 Malaysian medical students from 21 medical schools who voluntarily completed a self-administered online questionnaire that was disseminated by representatives from medical schools nationwide and social media platforms of a national medical student society.

Results

37.8% of the respondents were optimistic about a career with the Ministry of Health (MOH), Malaysia in the future. Most of the respondents (91.2%) plan to join and complete the MOH Housemanship programme as soon as possible after graduation, with the majority of them (66.2%) planning to complete it in their state of origin. After 2 years of Housemanship programme, only more than half of the respondents (63.1%) plan to continue their careers in MOH. Slightly more than a quarter (27.1%) of the total respondents plan to emigrate to practise medicine, with 80.7% of them planning to return to Malaysia to practise medicine after some years or after completing specialisation training. Combining the career intentions of Malaysian medical students immediately after graduation and upon completion of the 2 years housemanship programme, only a slight majority (57.5%) of the respondents plan to continue their career in MOH eventually. Most of the respondents (85.0%) intend to specialise.

Conclusion

A concerning number of Malaysian medical students plan to leave the Ministry of Health workforce, the main healthcare provider in Malaysia, in the future. Urgent government interventions are needed to address the underlying factors contributing to the potential exodus of future doctors to prevent further straining of the already overburdened healthcare system, posing a significant threat to public well-being. An annual national study to track medical students’ career intentions is recommended to gather crucial data for the human resources for health planning in Malaysia.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Background

Having a career in the medical profession is seen as a prestigious, highly respected and desired profession among students globally [1,2,3]. Although it is a highly competitive programme to be admitted into, the demand to enter the medical profession is still highly favourable. This is probably due to the ability to secure both a financially and socially rewarding career upon completion of study. There are 32 medical schools in Malaysia [4], both public and private institutions with a vast difference in the fee structure, producing close to 4000 medical graduates annually [5]. Training a medical graduate in a public institution in Malaysia requires a large portion of subsidy by the government to ensure the public is offered a recognised, high-quality yet affordable medical education. Hence, entry requirements into medical school remain to be of high level with an interview put in place in all medical schools to screen the potential students.

Career intentions of medical students may vary according to individual needs, with some wanting to stay for good, pursue a specialty of their choice or delaying specialist training, emigrating to practise medicine abroad, or leaving the profession for other endeavours. As opposed to medical schools abroad which practise graduate entry, medical schools in Malaysia admit undergraduate students who are around 19–20 years old. A medical student typically spends 5 years in medical school after a pre-university programme and then serves 2 years as a house officer (HO) as required under the Medical Act 1971 [6]. As these students mature through medical school, their career intentions may be affected by various factors.

Upon completion of housemanship, the student then obtains his full registration with the Malaysian Medical Council (MMC) [7] and functions as a medical officer (MO). The graduate would then be able to apply for government-sponsored specialist and sub-specialty training thereafter. However, specialist training has been uncertain in recent years due to the contractual appointment of medical officers which does not warrant sponsored specialist training prior to 2022 [8]; while limited seats were offered for contract medical officers from 2022 onwards [9], leaving many graduates considering other options for career advancement [8]. These medical officers will also need to compete with a large pool of applicants consisting of both local and overseas Malaysian doctors for a placement for postgraduate training. The training pathways differ from one specialty to another. Adding to the constraint of the long wait to continue postgraduate training, these medical officers are inundated with a heavy workload and are deemed under-remunerated [8].

The Malaysian public healthcare system has long been grappling with multiple human resource and financial issues, with a report released by the National Audit Department in 2018 which found the Emergency and Trauma Departments in Malaysian public hospitals to be underfunded, understaffed, and overloaded with patients [10]. The medical education landscape in Malaysia has been changing in recent years with the different policies being put in place. There was a delay in housemanship placement, coupled with the appointment to contract post leaving the medical graduates anxious and frustrated. In recent news, the delay in houseman placement has now cascaded to difficulty in recruitment and retaining these housemen. To make matters worse, the maldistribution of doctors to the hospitals has affected training opportunities and manpower in the workforce. Major public hospitals have been reported to have a lack of doctors [8, 11], causing services to be severely affected [12]. While these issues have been highlighted by various societies and movements to support the trainees, there seems to be a delay in providing adequate placement and support for continuing medical education. Furthermore, although the government has recently announced plans to improve these issues, such as raising the on-call allowance rates [13], overhauling human resource policies [14], and establishing a Health Service Commission to reform the public health sector [15, 16], these measures have yet to be implemented.

The career pathways remained uncertain with a lack of urgency from the relevant ministries. This has resulted in many medical graduates looking for other opportunities in other countries which has caused a brain drain to the nation [17]. Although there have been limited studies conducted recently on the career pathway of medical officers in Malaysia, there were even fewer studies focused on medical students’ career intentions, which are crucial for effective policy-making. The current medical students being the major stakeholders in the healthcare fraternity remain the country's asset as they will be the future workforce of the medical fraternity. There is an urgency to study the career intentions of active medical students enrolled in both public and private medical schools in Malaysia to inform the relevant authorities on the direction of these medical graduates which will affect the climate of the Malaysian healthcare workforce in the near future.

Objectives

This study aims to determine the current medical students’ career intentions immediately after graduation and upon completing the 2 years of housemanship and to establish the motivations behind these intentions.

Methods

Study design and setting

The Malaysian Medical Student Career Intention (MMSCI) study was a national and multi-centre cross-sectional online survey. This study involved participants from medical schools in Malaysia recognised by the Malaysian Medical Council (MMC) under the Second Schedule Medical Act 1971 [4] using a non-probable (convenience) sampling method. The data collection was conducted from the 5th of May 2023 to the 15th of October 2023.

Participant eligibility and recruitment

All medical students of Malaysian nationality who are registered in a public or private medical school recognised by the MMC and operating in Malaysia were eligible to join this study. The students must also complete the entire medical programme locally in Malaysia. Those completing pre-clinical years overseas but subsequently clinical years in Malaysia were also included.

To achieve a representative sample and improve the generalisation of the findings, a collaborative network of medical students—the ‘Malaysia MedEd Collaborative’ was established in collaboration with the Society of Malaysian Medical Association Medical Students (SMMAMS). An attempt to recruit collaborators from all universities was made through an open recruitment process via SMMAMS. A total of 30 collaborators were recruited from 18 out of 32 medical schools, with a maximum of 2 collaborators per medical school (1 pre-clinical year medical student and 1 clinical year medical student), before the study launch. All recruited collaborators were then given an online briefing session regarding the study’s aims and details, including the specifics of the questionnaire itself. The collaborators were then provided with the link to the online questionnaire hosted on Google Forms and were responsible for distributing the survey within their respective medical schools using various distribution channels such as social media, internal email communication, and word of mouth. Additionally, an invitation to participate was also distributed by SMMAMS through their various communication channels such as social media, internal newsletter, and internal email communication to reach the wider Malaysian medical students population. The sample size calculation using OpenEpi software determined that at least 377 responses were required to achieve a representative sample with a confidence level of 95% and 0.05 margin of error, based on an estimated student population of 20,000 (4000 medical students per year) in Malaysia. We multiplied the sample size by the predicted design effect of two to account for the use of convenience sampling and online survey [18]. Hence, the minimum survey sample size was 754 (377 × 2). However, in this study, we aimed to recruit at least 50 participants per medical school to ensure fair representativeness across medical schools.

Study instrument and data collection

A self-administered, 51-item online questionnaire was developed based on literature and hosted on Google Forms. The content of the questionnaire was validated by experts from the field of medical education. The questionnaire was designed in English language, as English language is used as the medium of instruction in all medical schools in Malaysia. The questions were formulated using Likert scale matrices, multiple-choice selections, and open-text entries. We then pilot-tested the questionnaire with nine medical students to assess its feasibility and relevance of the questionnaire. Feedback from the pilot study was collected to improve the questionnaire.

The questionnaire consists of four sections: (A) Demographic information; (B) Career outlook in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Malaysia; (C) Career Intentions after graduation and housemanship; (D) Specialisation Intentions. The complete questionnaire is provided in Supplementary File 1: MMSCI Questionnaire.

Each participant was informed of the purpose of the research and provided informed consent. All data from this study were stored in a secure password-protected cloud-based storage service account specifically created for this study and is only accessible by the core team.

Data analysis

A total of 882 responses from 21 medical schools were collected. Incomplete entries with missing data were excluded. Duplicated entries with the same name, IC or email were eliminated before analysis, with the earliest entry retained. Entries without informed consent and from international medical students were removed. Finally, 859 responses from 21 medical schools were included for analysis.

The IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA) was used to run the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics mainly proportion was used to present the outcomes. Age was reported using median and interquartile range as it was not normally distributed. For items with a 5-point Likert scale, the lowest 2 points (e.g. very unsatisfied and unsatisfied) and the highest 2 points (e.g. satisfied and very satisfied) were combined and presented with the neutral score.

Results

Demographics

A total of 859 medical students in Malaysia responded to this survey and their demography can be found in Table 1. Most of the respondents are female (64.4%), Chinese (41.3%) and from the state of Selangor (25.8%). The respondents are quite fairly distributed in terms of type of university: public (54.4%) vs private (45.6%); and year of study: pre-clinical (46.1%) vs clinical (53.9%). The median age of respondents was 22 (interquartile range = 2).

Table 1 Demographic profile of participants

Career perception and intention upon graduation

In terms of career perception upon graduation, 37.8% of the respondents were optimistic about a career with MOH in the future. Of all aspects of a career with MOH, satisfaction ranges from 8.0 to 37.4%. The most satisfied aspects are clinical exposure and general clinical skills training opportunities (37.4%), quality of specialisation training (33.3%), and duration of specialisation training (29.7%). There were six aspects which more than half of the respondents reported being unsatisfied with, which include work–life balance (67.6%), working hours (65.8%), job security (57.5%), working culture (57.0%), working environment and conditions (57.0%), and remuneration and pay at the houseman (HO) and medical officer level (51.1%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Career perception and intention upon graduation

Most of the respondents were planning to join and complete the MOH Housemanship programme as soon as possible after graduation (91.2%), with the majority choosing to pursue their housemanship in Kuala Lumpur (21.2%), followed by Selangor (20.1%), Sabah (9.5%) and Sarawak (9.5%). The majority of the respondents chose to complete their housemanship in their state of origin (66.2%). Of our responses, almost half (47.4%) understand how the Housemanship programme works and know what is expected from them in housemanship, and a majority of them think that they are adequately prepared for housemanship by their medical school (70.8%). Most of our respondents intend to specialise (85.0%) (Table 2).

Medical students’ career intention after housemanship

After completing the MOH Housemanship programme, slightly more than half of our respondents (63.1%) chose to continue their careers in MOH. The most important reasons for those who chose to remain in the MOH include clinical exposure and general clinical skills training opportunities (84.8%), opportunities to enter a specialisation training programme (83%), and job security (82.4%). The least important reasons were remuneration and pay at the Houseman (HO) and Medical Officer (MO) level (67.2%), work–life balance (69.4%), and remuneration and pay at the specialist level (71.5%). For those who chose not to continue their career in MOH after completing housemanship, the top reason was to emigrate and practise overseas (22.3%) (Table 3).

Table 3 Medical students’ career intention after housemanship

Medical students’ emigration intention to pursue medical career

Of all the 859 respondents in this survey, slightly more than a quarter plan to emigrate (27.1%). Among those who planned to emigrate, about a quarter (24.9%) planned to immediately emigrate after graduation from medical school while 75.1% planned to emigrate after completing housemanship. In terms of country, most chose Australia (27.5%), the United Kingdom (25.7%) and Singapore (14.4%) as the destination emigration countries. The most important reasons for emigration include working environment and conditions (92.7%), job security (92.3%), and working culture (91.4%). The least important reasons were personal reasons (68.2%), ability to choose a work location (76.4%), and duration of specialisation training (85.4%) (Table 4).

Table 4 Medical students’ emigration intention to pursue medical career

The majority (80.7%) of them planned to return to Malaysia after some years or after completing specialisation training (Table 4).

Medical students’ career outside of MOH, Malaysia

Of the 783 respondents who plan to complete their housemanship programme in Malaysia, 110 (14.0%) plan to move to private practice upon completion of housemanship (Table 3). Among the reasons for moving to private practice, the top three most important reasons included working environment and conditions (96.4%), ability to choose a work location (95.4%), and remuneration and pay (93.6%) (Table 5).

Table 5 Medical students’ career outside of MOH, Malaysia

Combining the career intentions of Malaysian medical students immediately after graduation and upon completion of the 2 years housemanship programme, only a slight majority (57.5%) of our respondents plan to continue their career in MOH eventually. Of those who chose a career outside of MOH, two-thirds chose to emigrate (67.0%) (Table 5).

Discussion

Perception of working in MOH

In recent years, a large number of Malaysian doctors (including specialists) have resigned from public service [19], while resignations among contract medical officers have risen by 1131% in 2022 compared to 2017 [20]. A total of 1696 medical officers have resigned from their positions in MOH in 2022 alone [21].

According to a recent poll conducted by CodeBlue in early 2023 [22], the majority of Malaysian government healthcare workers (inclusive of doctors, pharmacists, dentists, nurses, assistant medical officers, and allied healthcare workers) have been shown to be unsatisfied with the situation of the public healthcare system (98%), with almost three-quarters of them thinking of quitting the public healthcare sector (73%). A majority of government healthcare workers also noted that they felt they were underpaid (80%), overworked (78%), and insecure about their career progression (61%). The findings in our study were consistent with the general sentiment among public healthcare workers, where only a minority of our study participants were optimistic about a career with MOH (37.8%), and a majority were unsatisfied with the remuneration and pay at the HO and MO level (51.1%), working hours (65.8%), and job security (57.5%). This suggests that the sentiment towards Malaysian public healthcare was similar between both doctors and medical students.

Medical brain drain

Physician migration, often termed “brain drain”, is a global phenomenon, particularly noticeable from LMIC to HIC. A study from the UK suggested that 32.25% of medical students intended to emigrate to practise medicine abroad [23]; 33% of Pakistan medical students plan to leave Pakistan after graduation [24]; 45% of Indian medical students planned to pursue their residency abroad [25]; 49% of Ghanaian medical students had intentions to migrate after school [26]; 70.1% of Moroccan medical students had intention to leave the country [27]; 88% of Irish medical students indicated they were either definitely migrating or contemplating migrating following graduation or completion of the pre-registration intern year [28]. In comparison, Malaysian medical students, situated in a UMIC, show a moderate prevalence in their intention to emigrate. Globally, the most popular destinations for physician migration are the USA and the UK [29]. Our findings reveal that the migration destination intentions of Malaysian medical students align with global trends. Australia received the highest preference in our study, mirroring a trend seen in the UK and Ireland [23, 28].

It is shown that the medical brain drain is a complicated phenomenon resulting from push, pull and dyadic factors [29]. According to our study, over a quarter of the respondents intend to emigrate. Their decision to emigrate and pursue the early stages of their career in other countries is largely influenced by the working environment, job security, and working culture that MOH can provide. However, a significant majority (80.7%) of them plan to return to Malaysia to practise later on, with almost 40% of them planning to do so after completion of specialisation. A potential conclusion drawn from these results would be that Malaysian medical students would still desire to practise medicine in Malaysia; push factors play a huge role in their decision. Despite the majority intending to return to Malaysia after training abroad, their homecoming plans may face changes over the years due to various factors. More studies are required on this aspect.

Projected doctors’ workforce in MOH, Malaysia

In 2022, the number of medical graduates fell by 57% to 4875 from 8511 in 2019, attributed to the deferral of studies by medical students who did not complete their studies in the expected timeframe [30]. One of the reasons could be due to the interruption of studies by the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, it is estimated that Malaysian local medical schools will produce about 4000 medical graduates yearly with the admission quota of 4820 yearly imposed by the MOH [5]. Additionally, 1000 to 2000 overseas medical graduates return to Malaysia yearly, [31] summing up to around 6000 Malaysian medical graduates. Considering our study findings of 91.2% of our respondents’ intention of commencing their housemanship as soon as possible upon graduation, we expect a yearly intake of approximately 3648 local graduates, and 2000 overseas medical graduates, totalling around 5600 HO intake per year. This suggests a potential return to the pre-pandemic HO appointments level of 5000 to 6000 per year, addressing the current healthcare services limitation [30]. However, based on the low number of HO intake of 3271 in 2023, which has yet to show signs of an increase of intake from 2022, and compared to our estimated yearly HO intake of 5600, one should wonder whether the persistently low intake number in the recent years is solely due to the interruption of studies as reported. Hence, this again highlights the importance of an annual national medical graduate employment survey to closely follow the career intentions of Malaysian medical students.

Furthermore, there is also a maldistribution of doctors in Malaysia, especially between the rural and urban areas, with noticeable shortages in East Malaysia (Sabah and Sarawak). This imbalance is partly due to the reluctance of medical workers to practise in these areas of Malaysia [32]. Our study shows that the majority of respondents would like to complete their housemanship training in their state of origin. “Being close to home” has previously been listed as the top criterion for Malaysian medical graduates when selecting a hospital for their housemanship training [33]. Similar findings were also reported with medical students in other countries such as Germany [34], and Nepal [35]. Strong evidence has also shown that medical students with a rural origin were more likely to return to rural areas to practise medicine [36,37,38]. Given this evidence, we suggest policymakers explore strategies to increase the intake of medical students from rural origins, especially in Sabah and Sarawak and retain them in rural Malaysia. Interesting Japanese policies such as “Jichi” and “Chiikiwaku” have been proven effective in increasing the number of physicians in rural settings by providing education scholarships to medical students of rural origin that cover their medical education tuition. In return, Jichi graduates are expected to work in their home prefectures for 9 years to get their undergraduate tuition fee waived [39]. Other successful approaches include long rural immersion during medical school [40].

Upon completion of housemanship, a houseman will then progress to becoming a medical officer (MO), constituting the largest group of doctors within the MOH [41]. Our study reports that only 63.1% of medical students intend to stay within the Ministry of Health upon completion of housemanship, reflecting the current trend of more than 54% of MOs resigning in 2022 [21]. This is indeed alarming as public healthcare remains the main healthcare provider for most Malaysians, with 50.1% of the Malaysian population not having any means of supplementary financial coverage for medical treatment apart from tax-funded healthcare services by the government as highlighted by the National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2019 [42]. With an increased trend in the prevalence of NCDs [42] and as Malaysia progresses to become an aged nation by 2044 [43], the nation’s demand for public healthcare services will undoubtedly increase. Hence, the government should take immediate action to address the dissatisfaction of doctors and the healthcare workforce in general to mitigate and reverse the alarming trend of doctors leaving MOH [44]. Focused attention is suggested on aspects that more than half of our respondents reported being unsatisfied with such as work–life balance, working hours, job security, working culture, working environment and conditions, and remuneration and pay at the HO and MO levels. Recognising the complexity of this issue and its multi-stakeholder nature, the call to action is urgent. The urgency arises from the potential risk of further straining the already overburdened healthcare system, posing a significant threat to public well-being.

Lastly, it is known that Malaysia requires more medical specialists to support an increasing demand for health services. As of September 2021, there are 13,000 medical specialists across both public and private healthcare, yet the projection of needing 28,000 specialists by 2030 seems unattainable [45, 46]. Our study revealed that a high 85% of medical students intend to specialise. Hence, efforts should be taken to retain and train these aspiring medicos. A comprehensive analysis of the specialisation perception and intention of Malaysian medical students from this study will be published in the future.

Study limitation

There are several limitations in this study. Firstly, there was no representation from a small number of medical schools, potentially limiting the generalisation of our study. Selection bias may be present as the study may attract more students interested in this topic or better informed about Malaysian healthcare affairs. Some students may not have received invitations to this study or been made aware of this study, and others may have chosen not to participate. Furthermore, we intentionally excluded the option of pursuing a future career with the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) in university hospitals and the Ministry of Defence (MOD) in military hospitals while designing the study. This may lead to inaccuracy of the study as some may be interested in serving in MOHE or MOD. However, it is worth noting that the number of doctors working in MOHE and MOD is relatively small compared to those working with the MOH. Finally, it should be stressed that our respondents were medical students, and their current perceptions, as reported, might be influenced by various factors such as their limited knowledge of the realities of working as a doctor. These perceptions could evolve as they progress in their career and life stages.

Importance and implication

Some nations, such as Australia, New Zealand, [47] the United Kingdom [23, 48], the United Arab Emirates [49], and Malawi [50], possess robust literatures that have generated significant research outputs related to medical students’ career intentions. These literatures may have directly or indirectly shaped their medical education and health workforce policies [51]. The current limited literatures on this topic in Malaysia are usually single-centre [52, 53], which restrict the diversity and generalisation of the findings; have small sample sizes, reducing the statistical power and reliability of the findings; are dated [54] and lack comprehensiveness on career intentions [55, 56]. This study stands as the largest and most comprehensive investigation into Malaysian medical students’ career intentions, involving the majority of the medical schools in Malaysia. Hence, the findings of this study will address some of these knowledge gaps and provide comprehensive insights into Malaysian medical students’ career intentions. It is hoped that the findings will provide evidence-based value to the leaders and policymakers of MOH in the planning of human resources for health (HRH) and the ongoing health reforms.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the general perception and sentiment of Malaysian medical students regarding a future career with the MOH, Malaysia is varied. Most medical students would like to complete their housemanship programme in Malaysia, with the majority preferring to do so in their state of origin/ hometown. More than a quarter of medical students would like to emigrate overseas to practise, mostly upon completion of housemanship. Alarmingly, over 40% of Malaysian medical students would prefer a career outside of MOH, with most planning to leave MOH upon completion of housemanship. This study underscores the need for urgent government intervention to address the underlying factors contributing to the exodus of doctors, ultimately mitigating this alarming trend.

In light of the study’s insights, an annual, national, and large-scale survey on Malaysian medical students’ career intentions is recommended. Focused qualitative studies could further explore, explain, and validate the findings of this study. This is to ensure continual engagement with the future employees of MOH, providing invaluable data for the ongoing healthcare workforce planning and contributing to the long-term sustainability of Malaysia’s healthcare system.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

EU:

European Union

HIC:

High income country

HO:

House officer

HRH:

Human Resources for Health

IC:

Identity card

KL:

Kuala Lumpur

LMIC:

Low and middle income country

MMC:

Malaysian Medical Council

MMSCI:

Malaysian Medical Students’ Career Intention

MO:

Medical officer

MOD:

Ministry of Defence

MOH:

Ministry of Health

MOHE:

Ministry of Higher Education

NCD:

Non-communicable disease

NHMS:

The National Health and Morbidity Survey

SMMAMS:

Society of Malaysian Medical Association Medical Students

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

UK:

United Kingdom

UMIC:

Upper middle-income country

USA:

United States of America

References

  1. Woodward A, Thomas S, Jalloh MB, Rees J, Leather A. Reasons to pursue a career in medicine: a qualitative study in Sierra Leone. Glob Health Res Policy. 2017;2(1):34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Heikkilä TJ, Hyppölä H, Vänskä J, Aine T, Halila H, Kujala S, et al. Factors important in the choice of a medical career: a Finnish national study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ibrahim Bashir MM, Fadelalla Alrayah MA, Elsayed Mustafa ME, Abdulla Maroof MK, Omer Hamad MA, Ali Mohamedosman MM. Medicine as a career choice: a comprehensive study on factors influencing Sudanese students to opt in/out medical career. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Council MM. Medical Education & Recognition Malaysian Medical Council Official Portal2024. https://mmc.gov.my/medical-education-recognition/.

  5. CodeBlue. MOH reveals only 62% of housemen positions filled 2023. https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2023/02/16/moh-reveals-only-62-of-housemen-positions-filled/. Accessed 16 Feb 2023.

  6. Malaysia MoH. Overview of housemanship training in Malaysia 2024. https://hq.moh.gov.my/medicaldev/cawangan-pembangunan-profesyen-perubatan/malaysia-housemanship/.

  7. Council MM. Registration 2024. https://mmc.gov.my/registration/.

  8. Nadarajah A, Shankar PR, Jayaraman S, Sreeramareddy CT. House officers’ specialist career choices and motivators for their choice—a sequential mixed-methods study from Malaysia. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):796.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. CodeBlue. Contract doctors and dentists finally gets specialist scholarships 2022. https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2022/08/30/contract-doctors-and-dentists-finally-get-specialist-scholarships/. Accessed 30 Aug 2022.

  10. Aliman KH. Audit finds Malaysian hospitals understaffed, underfunded and overcrowded. Edge. 2019;2019:15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carvalho M, Tan T, Gimino G. Many large hospitals facing shortage of doctors and nurses. Star. 2023;2023:21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pfordten RVD. Staff shortage, patient load led Klang hospital to close emergency dept green zone. The Star. 2023;2023:3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahari H. New on-call rates for doctors to be announced soon. New Straits Times. 2024;2024:4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MalayMail. Health minister says overhauling HR policies to address doctor shortage Malay Mail. 1 July 2024.

  15. Ibrahim MI. Health Ministry to refer proposal for a health services commission to cabinet soon. New Straits Times. 2024;2024:22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MalayMail. Health service commission proposal to be referred to Cabinet, says health minister. Malay Mail. 2024 22 April 2024.

  17. Blue C. Attempts To Dismantle MOH’s Parallel Pathway Programme Will Worsen Brain Drain—MMA: Code Blue; 2024.

  18. Salganik MJ. Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. J Urban Health. 2006;83(6 Suppl):i98-112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reporters F. Nearly 7,000 govt medical officers, specialists have resigned since 2018 2023. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2023/03/22/nearly-7000-medical-officers-specialists-have-resigned-from-health-ministry-since-2018/.

  20. Su-Lyn B. More Contract Doctors Quit In 2022 Than In Two Previous Years Combined 2023. https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2023/02/24/more-contract-doctors-quit-in-2022-than-in-two-previous-years-combined/.

  21. Reporter TS. 54% of medical officers left public sector in 2022, says Health Minister. Star. 2024;2024:28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. CodeBlue. 95% Of Health Workers Say Malaysia’s Public Health Care System Is In Crisis Now 2023. https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2023/01/30/poll-95-of-health-workers-say-malaysias-public-health-care-system-is-in-crisis-now/.

  23. Tomas F, Alexander MC, Oliver F, Richard JS, Rita H. Career intentions of medical students in the UK: a national, cross-sectional study (AIMS study). BMJ Open. 2023;13(9): e075598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nadir F, Sardar H, Ahmad H. Perceptions of medical students regarding brain drain and its effects on Pakistan’s socio-medical conditions: a cross-sectional study. Pak J Med Sci. 2023. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.7139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kansal R, Singla A, Bawa A, Malhotra K, Lalchandan J, Grewal J, et al. A nationwide survey on the preference of Indian undergraduate medical students to go abroad for higher studies and residency. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2023. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.318_23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eliason S, Tuoyire D, Awusi-Nti C, Bockarie A. Migration Intentions of Ghanaian Medical Students: the influence of existing funding mechanisms of medical education (“The Fee Factor”). Ghana Med J. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v48i2.4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sylla AK, El Ouadih S, Barknan K, Hassoune S, Nani S. Migration intention of final year medical students. Eur J Public Health. 2021;31(Supplement_3):ckab165.448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gouda P, Kitt K, Evans DS, Goggin D, McGrath D, Last J, et al. Ireland’s medical brain drain: migration intentions of Irish medical students. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13(1):11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Adovor E, Czaika M, Docquier F, Moullan Y. Medical brain drain: how many, where and why? J Health Econ. 2021;76: 102409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zainuddin A. Amid Halved Housemen Numbers, District Hospitals Omitted From First 2024 Placement Intake 2024. https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2024/01/30/amid-halved-housemen-numbers-district-hospitals-omitted-from-first-2024-placement-intake/. Accessed 30 Jan 2024.

  31. Chung N. Ministry can’t absorb medical grads produced yearly, says MP: Free Malaysia Today (FMT); 2021. Accessed 5 Dec 2021.

  32. Miwil O. Health Ministry looking into medical workers' reluctance to work in Sabah, Sarawak. New Straits Times. 2023.

  33. Ang KT, Roslan Johari MG. Medical Graduates - Choice of Hospital for Housemanship Training and Readiness for District Posting. Journal of Health Management; Vol 6 No 1 (2009). 2023.

  34. Gibis B, Heinz A, Jacob R, Müller CH. The career expectations of medical students: findings of a nationwide survey in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(18):327–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sapkota BP, Amatya A. What factors influence the choice of urban or rural location for future practice of Nepalese medical students? A cross-sectional descriptive study. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13(1):84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. de Vries E, Reid S. Do South African medical students of rural origin return to rural practice? S Afr Med J. 2003;93(10):789–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Holst J. Increasing rural recruitment and retention through rural exposure during undergraduate training: an integrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Grobler L, Marais BJ, Mabunda S. Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(6):Cd005314.

  39. Matsumoto M, Matsuyama Y, Kashima S, Koike S, Okazaki Y, Kotani K, et al. Education policies to increase rural physicians in Japan: a nationwide cohort study. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19(1):102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Abid Y, Connell CJW, Sijnja B, Verstappen AC, Poole P. National study of the impact of rural immersion programs on intended location of medical practice in New Zealand. Rural Remote Health. 2020;20(4):5785.

  41. Malaysia MoH. MOH Annual Report 2022. 2022.

  42. National Health and Morbidity Survey 2019. 2020.

  43. Schmillen AD, Wang D, Yap WA, Bandaogo MASS, Simler K, Binti Ali Ahmad Z, et al. Malaysia can reap socio-economic dividends by improving policies for inclusive employment, income security and aged care. World Bank; 2020.

  44. Su-Lyn B. More contract doctors quit in 2022 than in two previous years combined. 2023 24 February 2023.

  45. Povera A, Yunus A. Malaysia needs more medical specialists, says Khairy. New Straits Times. 2021;2021:15.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ismail H. How many doctors do we need in the public sector?: A guide to human resource planning and specialist training. Malays J Med Sci. 2023;30(2):1–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zealand MDAaN. 2023 MSOD National Data Record 2023. https://medicaldeans.org.au/medical-schools-outcomes-database-reports/.

  48. Cutting J, Adil Salim Elbakri S, Adams HL, Jaunoo S. A national survey of medical student career ambitions. Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;102(1):44–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Abdulrahman M, Makki M, Shaaban S, Al Shamsi M, Venkatramana M, Sulaiman N, et al. Specialty preferences and motivating factors: A national survey on medical students from five UAE medical schools. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016;29(3):231–43.

  50. Bailey N, Mandeville KL, Rhodes T, Mipando M, Muula AS. Postgraduate career intentions of medical students and recent graduates in Malawi: a qualitative interview study. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12(1):87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kaur B, Carberry A, Hogan N, Roberton D, Beilby J. The medical schools outcomes database project: Australian medical student characteristics. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chew YW, Rajakrishnan S, Low CA, Jayapalan PK, Sreeramareddy CT. Medical students’ choice of specialty and factors determining their choice: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey in Melaka-Manipal Medical College. Malay Biosci Trends. 2011;5(2):69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Razali SM. Medical school entrance and career plans of Malaysian medical students. Med Educ. 1996;30(6):418–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Deva MP. Career choices of Malaysian medical students. Med J Malay. 1981;36(3):188–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Latt KK, Ismadi MAAN, Radzi NSM, Elisya N, Aref NNZ, Hamsah AD, et al. A study on malaysian medical students’ perception towards career opportunities and their knowledge on Malaysia health care system. Asian J Med Health Sci 2022;5(1):73.

  56. Nagandla K, Bhardwaj A, Swe KMM. Planning a Medical Career: Analysing Specialist Career Preference of Malaysian Medical Students. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res (IJSBAR). 2016;26(3):48–59.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Chee Yang Tan for his contributions in the early stages of this study. We would also like to thank the following personnel Ke Yuan Siew (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia); Hannan Humaira, Muhammad Zulkarnain Abd Rahim (Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia); Alisa Ahmad Hafizal (International Islamic University Malaysia); Mei Yee Wong (Management and Science University); Jeevan Kathiresan, Ina Dutta Gupta (Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia); Krisada Shen Yang Ooi, Muhammad Aniq Halim (International Medical University); Chuan Geng Chew (Universiti Putra Malaysia); Paul Sherng Ong, Jin Ren Lau (Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia); Kah Wei Kee (Quest International University); Yusuf Hamzah Anwar (Royal College of Medicine Perak); Tamanna Nadeem Bhaldar (Manipal University College Malaysia) for their involvement in data collection. We also thank the Society of Malaysian Medical Association Medical Students (SMMAMS) for their contribution to building the Malaysia MedEd Collaborative and for promoting this study. We also thank all students who voluntarily participated in this study.  

Malaysia MedEd Collaborative: Collaborators: Jeshua Nathaniel Devan (AIMST University); Nicolas Ong, Shen Hong Law (MAHSA University); Shiroshini Periasamy (Manipal University College Malaysia); Sweet Chiao Chean (Monash University Malaysia); Subhashini Sivagobi (Quest International University); Yuan Heng Chia, Jack Kang Tan (Universiti Malaya); Yu Xuan Teoh (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia); Eldon Tsai (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak); Jun Jie Oon, Felice Xiao Yuan Yeap (Universiti Sains Malaysia).

Funding

There is no funding allocated for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Z.S.T. was responsible for conceptualisation and ethical approval. Z.S.T. and G.T.Z.S. were responsible for project administration. ZST and G.T.Z.S. were responsible for collaborator recruitment and management. Z.S.T., G.T.Z.S., and W.H.H. were responsible for the questionnaire design. Z.S.T., G.T.Z.S., and C.H.T. were responsible for data analysis. Z.S.T., G.T.Z.S., W.H.H., and C.H.T. were responsible for the first draft of the manuscript. Y.F.A.Z. and J.V. provided their expert opinions and suggestions. All authors revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald Tze Zhen Ser.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Universiti Malaya Research Ethics Committee (Reference Number: UM.TNC2/UMREC_2486). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participation was voluntary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teng, Z.S., Ser, G.T.Z., Hong, WH. et al. Malaysian Medical Students’ Career Intention (MMSCI): a cross-sectional study. Hum Resour Health 22, 59 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00939-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00939-4

Keywords